Li Y
Shandong University of TCM, Jinan.
Zhonghua Yi Shi Za Zhi. 1999 Apr;29(2):104-8.
Many scholars believe that the original edition of Zhu Jie Shang Han Lun is the Song edition of Shang Han Lun proofread and corrected by Lin Yi. After comparing Shang Han Lun proofread and corrected by Lin Yi with that by Cheng's, it is found that there are many different words between them, which are difficult to be explained by that all these different words are caused by Cheng Wuji's negligence. Although some words in Zhu Jie Shang Han Lun are different from that in Shang Han Lun proofread and corrected by Lin Yi, part of these words are identical with that in Jin Gui Yu Han Jing, hence, the conclusion that these different words aren't caused by Cheng Wuji's arbitrary changes. There are many different editions of Shang Han Lun in the Song dynasty, for example, when comparing Shang Han Lun quoted by Guo Yong in Shang Han Bu Wang Lun with Shang Han Lun proofread and corrected by Lin Yi, it is found that the original editon used by Guo Yong is not the edition proofread and corrected by Lin Yi, but not all the scholars studying Shang Han Lun in the Song dynasty adopted Shang Han Lun proofread and corrected by Lin Yi, the original edition used by Cheng Wuji is not the edition proofread and corrected by Lin Yi.
许多学者认为,《注解伤寒论》的原版是林亿校勘的宋版《伤寒论》。将林亿校勘的《伤寒论》与成无己的《伤寒论》进行比较后发现,二者之间存在许多不同的文字,很难将所有这些不同文字都解释为成无己的疏忽所致。虽然《注解伤寒论》中的一些文字与林亿校勘的《伤寒论》不同,但其中一部分文字与《金匮玉函经》中的文字相同,因此,这些不同文字并非成无己随意改动所致。宋代有许多不同版本的《伤寒论》,例如,将郭雍《伤寒补亡论》中引用的《伤寒论》与林亿校勘的《伤寒论》进行比较时发现,郭雍所使用的原本并非林亿校勘的版本,而且宋代并非所有研究《伤寒论》的学者都采用林亿校勘的《伤寒论》,成无己所使用的原本也不是林亿校勘的版本。