Stolberg M
Technische Universitat Munchen, Germany.
Soc Hist Med. 2000 Apr;13(1):1-21. doi: 10.1093/shm/13.1.1.
The campaign against masturbation offers one of the outstanding success stories in the history of medical popularization. This paper seeks to identify the reasons for this success, focusing on the campaign's early stages, from the late seventeenth century onwards. It first identifies a series of often quite explicit political, ideological, and economic motives such as religious notions of 'uncleaniness', bourgeois concerns about self-control, marriage, and population growth, and the financial interests of the London veneral trade. Drawing, in particular, on the 'confessions of self-declared victims of masturbation in eighteenth-century patient letters, it then shows that the physical and mental symptoms attributed to masturbation very successfully addressed some of the deepest anxieties in contemporary society, anxieties about virility, gender identity, and physical selfhood. Finally, applying Bourdieu's notion of 'habitus', the central role of a new, implicitly male, more solid, closed and self-contained dominant body image is underlined. Framing the interpretation and the very experience of the body among the proponents and the recipients of anti-onanist discourse alike, it helped to make the dangers of masturbation an almost irrefutable, objective truth.
反对手淫的运动堪称医学普及史上最为成功的案例之一。本文旨在探究这一成功的原因,重点关注从17世纪末开始的运动早期阶段。文章首先指出了一系列往往相当明确的政治、意识形态和经济动机,比如关于“不洁”的宗教观念、资产阶级对自我控制、婚姻和人口增长的关注,以及伦敦性病行业的经济利益。特别是通过借鉴18世纪患者信件中自称手淫受害者的“忏悔”内容,文章进而表明,归因于手淫的身心症状非常成功地触及了当代社会一些最深层次的焦虑,即对男子气概、性别认同和身体自我的焦虑。最后,运用布迪厄的“惯习”概念,强调了一种新的、隐含男性特征的、更坚实、封闭且自成一体的主导身体形象的核心作用。它构建了反手淫话语支持者和接受者对身体的解读及身体体验,使得手淫的危害几乎成为无可辩驳的客观事实。