Mascherek Anna, Reidick Mirjam Christina, Gallinat Jürgen, Kühn Simone
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Front Psychol. 2021 Aug 9;12:693121. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.693121. eCollection 2021.
Despite its relevance for human sexuality, literature on potential effects of ejaculation frequency and masturbation on general and mental health outcomes is sparse. Reasons for this knowledge gap include a general lack of interest, but also methodological challenges and still existing superstition. This paper reconciles literature from various fields to extract relevant information on how ejaculation frequency effects general and mental health outcomes. Culture-bound syndromes have been reported in countries still strictly tabooing or condemning masturbation. Masturbatory guilt describes a phenomenon in individuals experiencing a discrepancy between moral standards and own behavior with respect to masturbation. Abstinence is one aspect under study in the area of fertility treatment. Specific time frames and their respective implications on quality of sperm remain inconclusive. Limited temporal resolution capacities hamper the precise study of brain structures directly activated during ejaculation. The relation between ejaculation frequency and hormonal influences remains poorly understood. Future research that specifically addresses ejaculation frequency and potential mental and general health outcomes is needed. In contrast to extracting knowledge as a byproduct from other studies with a different focus, this enables sound study designs and could provide evidence-based results which could then be further discussed and interpreted.
尽管射精频率和手淫对人类性行为具有相关性,但关于其对总体健康和心理健康结果潜在影响的文献却很稀少。造成这一知识空白的原因包括普遍缺乏兴趣,以及方法上的挑战和仍然存在的迷信观念。本文整合了各个领域的文献,以提取关于射精频率如何影响总体健康和心理健康结果的相关信息。在仍然严格禁止或谴责手淫的国家,已经报告了与文化相关的综合征。手淫内疚描述了个体在手淫的道德标准和自身行为之间存在差异时所经历的一种现象。禁欲是生育治疗领域正在研究的一个方面。特定的时间框架及其对精子质量的各自影响仍无定论。有限的时间分辨能力阻碍了对射精过程中直接激活的脑结构进行精确研究。射精频率与激素影响之间的关系仍知之甚少。需要开展专门针对射精频率以及潜在的心理和总体健康结果的未来研究。与从其他重点不同的研究中提取作为副产品的知识相比,这能够实现合理的研究设计,并能提供基于证据的结果,然后可以进一步讨论和解释。