Aronova Elena
University of California at San Diego, History Department and Science Studies Program, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0104, USA.
Hist Philos Life Sci. 2009;31(1):5-33.
This paper examines the deployment of science studies within the field of medical ethics. For a short time, the discourse of medical ethics became a fertile ground for a dialogue between philosophically minded bioethicists and the philosophers of science who responded to Thomas Kuhn's challenge. In their discussion of the validity of Kuhn's work, these bioethicists suggested a distinct interpretation of Kuhn, emphasizing the elements in his account that had been independently developed by Michael Polanyi, and propelling a view of science that retreated from idealizations of scientific method without sacrificing philosophical realism. Appropriating Polanyi, they extended his account of science to biology and medicine. The contribution of Karl Popper to the debate on the applicability of philosophy of science to the issues of medical ethics provides the opportunity to discuss the ways in which political agendas of different epistemologies of science intertwined with questions of concern to medical ethics.
本文考察了科学研究在医学伦理领域的应用。在短时间内,医学伦理的话语成为了有哲学思维的生物伦理学家与回应托马斯·库恩挑战的科学哲学家之间对话的沃土。在讨论库恩著作的有效性时,这些生物伦理学家对库恩提出了一种独特的解读,强调了他的论述中由迈克尔·波兰尼独立发展出来的元素,并推动了一种科学观,这种科学观在不牺牲哲学实在论的情况下,从对科学方法的理想化中后退。他们借鉴波兰尼的观点,将他对科学的论述扩展到生物学和医学领域。卡尔·波普尔对科学哲学在医学伦理问题上适用性辩论的贡献,为讨论不同科学认识论的政治议程与医学伦理关切问题相互交织的方式提供了契机。