Suppr超能文献

托马斯·亨利·赫胥黎对德国细胞学说的批判:细胞结构的后生论与生理学阐释

T.H. Huxley's criticism of German cell theory: an epigenetic and physiological interpretation of cell structure.

作者信息

Richmond M L

机构信息

Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48202, USA.

出版信息

J Hist Biol. 2000 Fall;33(2):247-89. doi: 10.1023/a:1004881730937.

Abstract

In 1853, the young Thomas Henry Huxley published a long review of German cell theory in which he roundly criticized the basic tenets of the Schleiden-Schwann model of the cell. Although historians of cytology have dismissed Huxley's criticism as based on an erroneous interpretation of cell physiology, the review is better understood as a contribution to embryology. "The Cell-theory" presents Huxley's "epigenetic" interpretation of histological organization emerging from changes in the protoplasm to replace the "preformationist" cell theory of Schleiden and Schwann (as modified by Albert von Kolliker), which posited the nucleus as the seat of organic vitality. Huxley's views influenced a number of British biologists, who continued to oppose German cell theory well into the twentieth century. Yet Huxley was pivotal in introducing the new German program of "scientific zoology" to Britain in the early 1850s, championing its empiricist methodology as a means to enact broad disciplinary and institutional reforms in British natural history.

摘要

1853年,年轻的托马斯·亨利·赫胥黎发表了一篇关于德国细胞学说的长篇评论,他在其中严厉批评了施莱登 - 施旺细胞模型的基本信条。尽管细胞学历史学家认为赫胥黎的批评是基于对细胞生理学的错误解读而不予理会,但这篇评论更好地被理解为对胚胎学的贡献。《细胞学说》展示了赫胥黎对组织学组织的“渐成论”解释,这种解释源于原生质的变化,以取代施莱登和施旺(经阿尔伯特·冯·克利克尔修正)的“预成论”细胞学说,后者将细胞核视为有机生命力的所在。赫胥黎的观点影响了许多英国生物学家,他们在20世纪仍继续反对德国细胞学说。然而,赫胥黎在19世纪50年代初将新的德国“科学动物学计划”引入英国方面起到了关键作用,支持其经验主义方法论,将其作为在英国自然历史领域进行广泛学科和制度改革的一种手段。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验