Snelders H A
Institute for the History of Science, Utrecht.
Ber Wiss. 1995;18(2):67-78. doi: 10.1002/bewi.19950180202.
Dutch science flourished in the late sixteenth and in the seventeenth century thanks to the immigration of cartographers, botanists, mathematicians, astronomers and the like from the Southern Netherlands after the Spanish army had captured the city of Antwerp in 1585, and thanks to the religious and the socio-economic situation of the country. A strong impulse for practical scientific activities started from the Reformation, mainly thanks to its anti-traditional attitude, which had an anti-rationalistic tendency. Therefore, in the Northern Netherlands there was no 'warfare' between science and religion and the biblical arguments leading to Galileo's condemnation were not used. Although the growth of the exact sciences and of technology in the late sixteenth and the seventeenth centuries in Protestant circles may be partly attributed to the expansion of trade, industry, navigation and so on, this does not explain why there was also at the same time a great interest in subjects as botany and zoology, which had no immediate economic utility. There were discussions about Copernicanism and Cartesianism. So a number of astronomers and theologians rejected the earth's movement on scientific and religious grounds, but there were also those who did not reject the Copernican system on biblical grounds. In the seventeenth century there was much discussion between science and religion in the Northern Netherlands, but that discussion was not followed by censure by the Church of the State. In the Republic there was a large amount of intellectual freedom in the study of the natural sciences, thanks to practical and ideological considerations. In the eighteenth century the seventeenth century tension between science and religion changed into a physicotheological natural science. It was believed that investigations into the workings of nature should lead to a better understanding of its Creator. So Bernard Nieuwentijt in his well-known book: The right use of world views for the conviction of atheists and unbelievers (1715) intended to prove the existence of God on the basis of teleological arguments.
由于1585年西班牙军队攻占安特卫普后,制图师、植物学家、数学家、天文学家等从南荷兰移民而来,也由于荷兰的宗教及社会经济状况,荷兰科学在16世纪末和17世纪蓬勃发展。对实践科学活动的强烈推动始于宗教改革,这主要归功于其反传统的态度,这种态度具有反理性主义倾向。因此,在荷兰北部,科学与宗教之间没有“冲突”,导致伽利略受谴责的圣经论据也未被采用。尽管16世纪末和17世纪新教圈子里精密科学和技术的发展可能部分归因于贸易、工业、航海等的扩张,但这并不能解释为什么同时人们对植物学和动物学等没有直接经济用途的学科也有浓厚兴趣。当时有关于哥白尼主义和笛卡尔主义的讨论。所以一些天文学家和神学家基于科学和宗教理由拒绝地球运动的观点,但也有人并非基于圣经理由拒绝哥白尼体系。17世纪,荷兰北部科学与宗教之间有很多讨论,但这种讨论并未导致教会或国家的谴责。由于实际和思想方面的考虑,在荷兰共和国,自然科学研究有很大的知识自由。18世纪,17世纪科学与宗教之间的紧张关系转变为物理神学史观的自然科学。人们认为对自然运作的研究应能让人更好地理解其创造者。所以伯纳德·纽温蒂特在他的名著《世界观对无神论者和无信仰者的正确运用》(1715年)中,试图基于目的论论据证明上帝的存在。