Selkirk G A, McLellan T M
Faculty of Physical Education and Health, Exercise Science, University of Toronto, Toronto M5S 2W6, Canada M3M 3B9.
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2001 Nov;91(5):2055-63. doi: 10.1152/jappl.2001.91.5.2055.
This study examined the independent and combined importance of aerobic fitness and body fatness on physiological tolerance and exercise time during weight-bearing exercise while wearing a semipermeable protective ensemble. Twenty-four men and women were matched for aerobic fitness and body fatness in one of four groups (4 men and 2 women in each group). Aerobic fitness was expressed per kilogram of lean body mass (LBM) to eliminate the influence of body fatness on the expression of fitness. Subjects were defined as trained (T; regularly active with a peak aerobic power of 65 ml x kg LBM(-1) x min(-1)) or untrained (UT; sedentary with a peak aerobic power of 53 ml x kg LBM(-1) x min(-1)) with high (High; 20%) or low (Low; 11%) body fatness. Subjects exercised until exhaustion or until rectal temperature reached 39.5 degrees C or heart rate reached 95% of maximum. Exercise times were significantly greater in T(Low) (116 +/- 6.5 min) compared with their matched sedentary (UT(Low); 70 +/- 3.6 min) or fatness (T(High); 82 +/- 3.9 min) counterparts, indicating an advantage for both a high aerobic fitness and low body fatness. However, similar effects were not evident between T(High) and UT(High) (74 +/- 4.1 min) or between the UT groups (UT(Low) and UT(High)). The major advantage attributed to a higher aerobic fitness was the ability to tolerate a higher core temperature at exhaustion (the difference being as great as 0.9 degrees C), whereas both body fatness and rate of heat storage affected the exercise time as independent factors.
本研究探讨了在穿着半透性防护服进行负重运动时,有氧适能和体脂对生理耐受性及运动时间的独立及综合影响。24名男性和女性按照有氧适能和体脂情况分为四组(每组4名男性和2名女性)。有氧适能以每千克去脂体重(LBM)来表示,以消除体脂对适能表达的影响。受试者被定义为训练有素(T;经常运动,峰值有氧功率为65毫升×千克LBM⁻¹×分钟⁻¹)或未受过训练(UT;久坐不动,峰值有氧功率为53毫升×千克LBM⁻¹×分钟⁻¹),体脂高(High;20%)或低(Low;11%)。受试者持续运动直至 exhaustion或直肠温度达到39.5摄氏度或心率达到最大心率的95%。与匹配的久坐不动者(UT(Low);70±3.6分钟)或肥胖者(T(High);82±3.9分钟)相比,T(Low)组的运动时间显著更长(116±6.5分钟),这表明高有氧适能和低体脂都具有优势。然而,T(High)组和UT(High)组(74±4.1分钟)之间或UT组(UT(Low)和UT(High))之间没有明显的类似效果。较高有氧适能的主要优势在于能够在 exhaustion时耐受更高的核心温度(差异高达0.9摄氏度),而体脂和热量储存速率均作为独立因素影响运动时间。