Institute of Ethics and History of Medicine, University of Tübingen, Gartenstrasse 47, 72074, Tübingen, Germany.
Sci Eng Ethics. 2020 Aug;26(4):2277-2293. doi: 10.1007/s11948-020-00219-z. Epub 2020 Apr 29.
The ethics of using nonhuman animals in biomedical research is usually seen as a subfield of animal ethics. In recent years, however, the ethics of animal research has increasingly become a subfield within research ethics under the term "animal research ethics". Consequently, ethical issues have become prominent that are familiar in the context of human research ethics, such as autonomy or self-determination, harms and benefits, justice, and vulnerability. After a brief overview of the development of the field and a discussion of relevant theoretical ethical frameworks, I consider two of these issues, namely autonomy and self-determination on the one hand, and harms and benefits on the other hand. My concern is with philosophical and ethical issues, rather than animal research oversight. I focus my discussion on nonhuman primates, as the most plausible nonhuman candidates for this approach. I conclude that the approach, although promising, depends strongly on the moral status of nonhuman research subjects.
在生物医学研究中使用非人类动物的伦理问题通常被视为动物伦理的一个分支。然而,近年来,动物研究的伦理问题越来越成为研究伦理领域内的一个分支,术语为“动物研究伦理”。因此,一些在人类研究伦理背景下熟悉的伦理问题变得突出,例如自主性或自我决定、伤害和利益、公正和脆弱性。在简要概述该领域的发展并讨论相关的理论伦理框架之后,我考虑了其中两个问题,即自主性和自我决定,以及伤害和利益。我关注的是哲学和伦理问题,而不是动物研究监督。我将讨论的重点放在非人类灵长类动物上,因为它们是非人类最有可能的候选者。我的结论是,这种方法虽然有前景,但强烈依赖于非人类研究对象的道德地位。