Fins Joseph J, Miller Franklin G, Bacchetta Matthew D
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 1998 Mar;8(1):37-42. doi: 10.1353/ken.1998.0001.
This response to Lynn Jansen's critique of clinical pragmatism concentrates on two themes: (1) contrasting approaches to moral epistemology and (2) the connection between theory and practice in clinical ethics. Particular attention is paid to the status of principles and the role of consensus, with some closing speculations on how Dewey might view the current state of bioethics.
对林恩·詹森对临床实用主义的批评的回应集中在两个主题上:(1)道德认识论的不同方法,以及(2)临床伦理学中理论与实践的联系。特别关注原则的地位和共识的作用,并对杜威可能如何看待当前生物伦理学的状况进行了一些最后的思考。