Suppr超能文献

在受控实验室环境中,非吸烟者在极低环境烟草烟雾浓度下的急性感官反应。

Acute sensory responses of nonsmokers at very low environmental tobacco smoke concentrations in controlled laboratory settings.

作者信息

Junker M H, Danuser B, Monn C, Koller T

机构信息

Institute for Hygiene and Applied Physiology, Federal Institute of Technology, ETH-Center, Clausiusstrasse 25, CH-8092 Zürich, Switzerland.

出版信息

Environ Health Perspect. 2001 Oct;109(10):1045-52. doi: 10.1289/ehp.011091045.

Abstract

The objective of this study was to provide a basis for effectively protecting nonsmokers from acute sensory impacts and for preventing deterioration of indoor air quality caused by environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) emissions. With an olfactory experiment we determined odor detection thresholds (OT) of sidestream ETS (sETS), and with a full-body exposure experiment we investigated sensory symptoms at very low sETS exposure concentrations. OT concentrations for sETS are three and more orders of magnitude lower than ETS concentrations measured in field settings and correspond to a fresh air dilution volume of > 19,000 m(3) per cigarette, over 100 times more than had previously been suggested for acceptable indoor air conditions. Eye and nasal irritations were observed at one order of magnitude lower sETS concentrations than previously reported, corresponding to a fresh air dilution volume of > 3,000 m(3) per cigarette. These findings have great practical implications for defining indoor air quality standards in indoor compartments where ETS emissions occur. Our study strongly supports the implementation and control of smoking policies such as segregating smoking areas from areas where smoking is not permitted or instituting smoking bans in public buildings.

摘要

本研究的目的是为有效保护不吸烟者免受急性感官影响以及防止环境烟草烟雾(ETS)排放导致室内空气质量恶化提供依据。通过嗅觉实验,我们测定了侧流ETS(sETS)的气味检测阈值(OT),并通过全身暴露实验,研究了在极低sETS暴露浓度下的感官症状。sETS的OT浓度比在实际场景中测得的ETS浓度低三个及以上数量级,相当于每支香烟的新鲜空气稀释量>19,000立方米,比之前建议的可接受室内空气条件下的稀释量多100倍以上。在比之前报告低一个数量级的sETS浓度下就观察到了眼睛和鼻腔刺激,这相当于每支香烟的新鲜空气稀释量>3,000立方米。这些发现对于定义存在ETS排放的室内空间的室内空气质量标准具有重大实际意义。我们的研究有力地支持了实施和控制吸烟政策,例如将吸烟区与非吸烟区分开,或在公共建筑中实施禁烟令。

相似文献

5

引用本文的文献

8
Outdoor smoking areas: does the science support a ban?室外吸烟区:科学依据支持禁令吗?
Environ Health Perspect. 2013 Jul;121(7):A229. doi: 10.1289/ehp.121-a229.

本文引用的文献

10
Effects of odorants and irritants on respiratory behavior.气味剂和刺激物对呼吸行为的影响。
Laryngoscope. 1994 May;104(5 Pt 1):623-6. doi: 10.1002/lary.5541040517.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验