Suppr超能文献

医生对未遵循“最佳实践”的解释。

Physician explanations for failing to comply with "best practices".

作者信息

Mottur-Pilson C, Snow V, Bartlett K

机构信息

American College of Physicians-American Society of Internal Medicine, Department of Scientific Policy, Philadelphia, Penn., USA.

出版信息

Eff Clin Pract. 2001 Sep-Oct;4(5):207-13.

Abstract

CONTEXT

Substantial effort has been devoted to improving physician compliance with evidence-based guidelines.

OBJECTIVE

To explore physicians' reasons for not following so-called "best practices" in caring for patients with type 2 diabetes.

DESIGN

Descriptive study of self-assessed compliance with five measures of performance.

PARTICIPANTS

Eighty-five internists who volunteered to participate in a practice-based research network created to improve clinical practice.

DATA COLLECTION

Physicians reviewed their own charts of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (1755 patient encounters) to assess compliance and offered open-ended comments concerning their reasons for not complying with "best practices."

RESULTS

The physician volunteers reported not complying with the annual foot examination in 13% of encounters. A similar level of noncompliance was reported for the annual lipid profile (15%) and retinal examination (17%). Among the five measures examined, noncompliance was most common for screening urinalysis (26%) and screening microalbuminuria (46%). The physicians' open-ended comments suggested that physician oversight, patient nonadherence, and systems issues were common reasons for noncompliance. However, noncompliance also resulted from a conscious decision by the physician, as indicated by comments about patient age and comorbid illness or, with nephropathy screening, established renal disease or current therapy with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors.

CONCLUSIONS

Even among a self-selected group of physicians, noncompliance with best practices in diabetes is common. Although physician forgetfulness and external factors are frequently offered as reasons for noncompliance, it may also result from a conscious decision, as physicians may disagree about what constitutes "best practices."

摘要

背景

为提高医生对循证指南的依从性已付出了巨大努力。

目的

探讨医生在护理2型糖尿病患者时不遵循所谓“最佳实践”的原因。

设计

对自我评估的五项绩效指标依从性的描述性研究。

参与者

85名内科医生,他们自愿参与一个为改善临床实践而创建的基于实践的研究网络。

数据收集

医生查阅了自己的2型糖尿病患者病历(1755次患者诊疗)以评估依从性,并就不遵循“最佳实践”的原因提供了开放式评论。

结果

医生志愿者报告在13%的诊疗中未进行年度足部检查。年度血脂检查(15%)和视网膜检查(17%)的不依从率与之相似。在所检查的五项指标中,筛查尿常规(26%)和筛查微量白蛋白尿(46%)的不依从最为常见。医生的开放式评论表明,医生监督不力、患者不依从和系统问题是不依从的常见原因。然而,不依从也源于医生的自觉决定,如关于患者年龄和合并症的评论所示,或者在肾病筛查方面,源于已确诊的肾病或当前使用血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂的治疗。

结论

即使在一组自行选择的医生中,不遵循糖尿病最佳实践的情况也很常见。虽然医生遗忘和外部因素经常被作为不依从的原因,但这也可能是由于自觉决定,因为医生可能对什么构成“最佳实践”存在分歧。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验