Economic consequences of an implanted neuroprosthesis for bladder and bowel management.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether an implanted neuroprosthesis for bladder and bowel management is less costly than conventional techniques.

DESIGN

Retrospective cost-identification analysis with comparison before and after implantation of the neuroprosthesis.

SETTING

Life-care planning interviews in patients' homes.

PATIENTS

Twelve patients with complete suprasacral spinal cord injuries and neurogenic bladder and bowel.

INTERVENTION

Implantation of a neuroprosthesis for electric stimulation of the sacral nerves and posterior sacral rhizotomy.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Annual costs of bladder and bowel care with and without the neuroprosthesis, projected over 10 years.

RESULTS

Bladder and bowel care costs were reduced by over 80%, from a median of 8152 dollars a year for conventional care to a median of 948 dollars a year. With the neuroprosthesis, median annual costs for bladder supplies were reduced from 3368 dollars to 58 dollars; for medications, from 1866 dollars to 108 dollars; for medical care, from 656 dollars to 96 dollars; and for bowel care supplies, from 205 dollars to 87 dollars. After 5 years, the cumulative costs of treatment with the neuroprosthesis, including the cost of the device and its implantation and maintenance, equaled those of conventional care. Thereafter, savings from the implanted neuroprosthesis are projected to increase progressively throughout the patient's life.

CONCLUSION

A neuroprosthesis implant with posterior rhizotomy greatly reduces the cost of managing the neurogenic bladder and bowel.