Marigo L, Rizzi M, La Torre G, Rumi G
Istituto di Clinica Odontoiatrica, Universita Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Policlinico Agostino Gemelli, Largo A Gemelli, 8, 00168, Rome, Italy.
Oper Dent. 2001 Nov-Dec;26(6):562-8.
A microfilled and hybrid resin composites used for esthetic restoration were finished and polished using four methods: Enhance system, Sof-Lex system, Multi-step system and Identoflex points. The tested materials were condensed into cylindrical molds, covered with a Mylar matrix at the surface to be tested and incrementally cured according to manufacturers' instructions. Samples were randomized into four groups of three for each material and were finished/polished using the different methods. The samples were then analyzed by a 3-D surface profiler to obtain roughness average (Ra), root mean square value (rms), greatest distance peak-valley (PV), measure of profile about the center line (Rsk) and measure of steepness of the amplitude density curve of the roughness profile (Rku) directly from the tested area. This method offers the advantage of being error-free. All parameters were determined for each sample and the mean of each parameter was determined for each group. ANOVA and Sheffé's test were employed to determine whether significant differences existed. The Enhance and Multi-step systems gave the best finish and polish for both materials.
Enhance系统、Sof-Lex系统、多步骤系统和Identoflex磨头。将测试材料压缩成圆柱形模具,在待测试表面覆盖聚酯薄膜基质,并根据制造商说明逐步固化。将样品随机分为四组,每种材料每组三个,使用不同方法进行修整/抛光。然后通过三维表面轮廓仪对样品进行分析,直接从测试区域获得平均粗糙度(Ra)、均方根值(rms)、最大峰谷距离(PV)、中心线轮廓测量值(Rsk)以及粗糙度轮廓的振幅密度曲线陡度测量值(Rku)。该方法具有无误差的优点。确定每个样品的所有参数,并确定每组每个参数的平均值。采用方差分析和谢费检验来确定是否存在显著差异。Enhance系统和多步骤系统对两种材料的修整和抛光效果最佳。