London A J
Department of Philosophy and Center for the Advancement of Applied Ethics, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2000 Dec;10(4):287-305. doi: 10.1353/ken.2000.0028.
An Aristotelian conception of practical ethics can be derived from the account of practical reasoning that Aristotle articulates in is Rhetoric and this has important implications for the way we understand the nature and limits of practical ethics. an important feature of this conception of practical ethics is its responsiveness to the complex ways in which agents form and maintain moral commitments, and this has important implications for the debate concerning methods of ethics in applied ethics. In particular, this feature enables us to understand casuistry, narrative, and principlism as mutually supportive modes of moral inquiry, rather than divergent and mutually exclusive methods of ethics. As a result, an Aristotelian conception of practical ethics clears the conceptual common ground upon which practical ethicists can forge a stable and realistic self-understanding.
一种亚里士多德式的实践伦理学概念可以从亚里士多德在其《修辞学》中阐述的实践推理论述中推导出来,这对我们理解实践伦理学的本质和局限性的方式具有重要意义。这种实践伦理学概念的一个重要特征是它对行动者形成和维持道德承诺的复杂方式的回应性,这对应用伦理学中有关伦理学方法的辩论具有重要意义。特别是,这一特征使我们能够将决疑法、叙事法和原则主义理解为相互支持的道德探究模式,而不是相互分歧和相互排斥的伦理学方法。因此,一种亚里士多德式的实践伦理学概念为实践伦理学家能够形成稳定而现实的自我理解清理了概念上的共同基础。