Suppr超能文献

强制限制香烟焦油含量是一项值得推行的公共卫生政策吗?

Is compulsory restriction of tar yield of cigarettes a worthwhile public health policy?

作者信息

Woodward M

机构信息

Cardiovascular Epidemiology Unit, University of Dundee, Scotland, UK.

出版信息

Am J Prev Med. 2001 Nov;21(4):284-90. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(01)00367-1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although the notion of a "safe cigarette" has proved an illusion, while people continue to smoke, an issue remains of whether compulsory restriction of tar yield is a worthwhile public health policy.

METHODS

The study group was comprised of a random population sample of middle-aged Scottish men and women-3464 smokers of cigarettes with known tar yield at baseline. Tar yields were classified into low (< 10 mg), low/middle (10-14.99 mg), and middle or high (> or = 15 mg), according to standard groupings. Deaths within the study cohort were recorded over a period of 13 years.

RESULTS

Among low, low/middle, and middle or high tar smokers, 55 (10%), 178 (16%), and 276 (16%), respectively, died. In a comparison group of lifetime never-smokers, 178 (6%) died. After adjustment for daily cigarette dose, duration of smoking, age, gender, social class, type A personality, body mass index, urinary potassium, and antioxidant vitamin consumption, hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) for all-cause mortality comparing low-tar smokers to low/middle-tar smokers and to middle- or high-tar smokers were 1.64 (1.04-2.58) and 1.46 (0.95-2.26), respectively. Corresponding results for cardiovascular disease were 1.48 (0.74-2.96) and 1.35 (0.79-2.60). For lung cancer, after adjusting for known confounding factors, corresponding hazard ratios were 2.82 (0.98-8.15) and 2.30 (0.81-6.49).

CONCLUSIONS

Smoking any type of cigarette is far more risky than abstaining altogether. Although the results obtained comparing tar levels are limited because of lack of repeat measures of smoking during follow-up, potential residual confounding factors, statistical imprecision, and failure to show a dose-response relationship, results do support the hypothesis that persistent smokers will reduce their tobacco-induced health risk if they smoke cigarettes with < 10 mg of tar. However, the data do not permit quantification of the benefits of switching to lower-tar cigarettes. Worldwide legislation to limit tar levels to 10 mg as an absolute maximum is recommended, while recognizing that this must be part of an integrated approach to tobacco control.

摘要

背景

尽管“安全香烟”的概念已被证明是一种幻想,但在人们继续吸烟的情况下,强制限制焦油含量是否是一项值得推行的公共卫生政策仍是一个问题。

方法

研究组由苏格兰中年男性和女性的随机人群样本组成,共3464名基线时已知焦油含量的吸烟者。根据标准分组,焦油含量分为低(<10毫克)、低/中(10 - 14.99毫克)和中或高(≥15毫克)。在13年的时间里记录研究队列中的死亡情况。

结果

在低焦油、低/中焦油和中或高焦油吸烟者中,分别有55人(10%)、178人(16%)和276人(16%)死亡。在终生不吸烟者的对照组中,有178人(6%)死亡。在对每日吸烟量、吸烟持续时间、年龄、性别、社会阶层、A型性格、体重指数、尿钾和抗氧化维生素摄入量进行调整后,低焦油吸烟者与低/中焦油吸烟者以及中或高焦油吸烟者相比,全因死亡率的风险比(95%置信区间)分别为1.64(1.04 - 2.58)和1.46(0.95 - 2.26)。心血管疾病的相应结果为1.48(0.74 - 2.96)和1.35(0.79 - 2.60)。对于肺癌,在调整已知的混杂因素后,相应的风险比为2.82(0.98 - 8.15)和2.30(0.81 - 6.49)。

结论

吸任何类型的香烟都比完全不吸烟风险大得多。尽管由于随访期间缺乏吸烟的重复测量、潜在的残留混杂因素、统计不精确以及未能显示剂量反应关系,比较焦油水平获得的结果有限,但结果确实支持这样的假设,即持续吸烟者如果吸焦油含量<10毫克的香烟,将降低其烟草导致的健康风险。然而,这些数据无法量化改用低焦油香烟的益处。建议在全球范围内立法将焦油水平绝对上限限制在10毫克,同时认识到这必须是烟草控制综合方法的一部分。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验