Pankow J F
Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, OGI School of Science & Engineering, Oregon Health & Science University, P.O. Box 91000, Portland, OR 97291-1000, USA.
Chem Res Toxicol. 2001 Nov;14(11):1465-81. doi: 10.1021/tx0100901.
Tobacco smoke is an aerosol that contains both gaseous and suspended particulate material (PM). The particles are largely liquid droplets containing a wide variety of condensed organic compounds. Each compound in the smoke will partition between the gas and PM phases and will always seek a state of gas/particle equilibrium. When tobacco smoke is inhaled, a compound such as nicotine can deposit in the respiratory tract (RT) by four different mechanisms: (1) direct gas deposition (DGD) of the portion of the compound that is initially in the gas phase of the inhaled smoke; (2) evaporative gas deposition (EGD) of PM-phase compound by evaporation to the gas phase, then deposition; (3) particle deposition, evaporation from the deposited particle, then deposition from the gas phase (PDE); and (4) particle deposition with diffusion (PDD) into RT tissue. Three of the mechanisms (DGD, EGD, and PDE) involve volatilization from the PM phase. The relative importance of all the mechanisms is therefore greatly affected by the volatility of the compound from the PM phase as it is set by the compound's gas/particle partitioning constant K(p) through the compound's vapor pressure. For a largely nonvolatile compound such as benzo[a]pyrene, only PDD will likely be important. For a semivolatile compound such as nicotine, all four mechanisms can be important. Because tobacco smoke alkaloids such as nicotine can exist in protonated as well as free-base form, the fraction alpha(fb) of the compound that is in the neutral free-base form in the PM phase plays a critical, pH-dependent role in determining the relative importance of the four mechanisms. Equations are developed that can be used to ascertain the importance of the DGD and EGD mechanisms. The value of alpha(fb) for nicotine in a tobacco smoke PM is set by pH(eff), the effective pH of the PM phase. Historically, a primary method for measuring "smoke pH" has involved the direct exposure of a pH electrode to tobacco smoke. This method cannot yield direct insight into pH(eff) or alpha(fb) values because (1) problems exist in using such an electrode to measure smoke PM-phase pH, and (2) by itself, a measurement of the pH of tobacco smoke PM says nothing about the effects of PM-phase activity coefficients of protonated and free-base nicotine on the nicotine species distribution. The "acidic" values that have typically been measured for cigarette "smoke pH" by the direct pH electrode method are therefore neither reliable nor useful in determining the relative distribution of PM-phase nicotine among the protonated and free-base forms. The dependence of the volatility of nicotine from tobacco smoke PM on alpha(fb) means that measuring the gas/particle distribution of nicotine under equilibrium conditions in a tobacco smoke by denuder samplers (or by another method) can yield information about the nicotine K(p) for that smoke. Knowledge of K(p,fb), the partitioning constant for nicotine in the free-base form, then allows calculation of alpha(fb) through the relation K(p) = K(p,fb)/alpha(fb). The available data suggest that the smoke PM from some commercial cigarettes can be characterized by alpha(fb) > or = 0.4, i.e., 40% or more of the nicotine in the free-base form. This conclusion is consistent with (1) the gas-sampling denuder results obtained by Philip Morris in which significant tobacco smoke nicotine was observed to deposit in acid-coated denuder tubes, with more depositing when the cigarette tobacco blend was treated with ammonia; (2) the view that the sensory "impact" exhibited by some tobacco smokes is caused by the deposition of gaseous nicotine in the pharynx; (3) the observed throat irritation caused by nicotine inhalers; and (4) the high overall respiratory tract deposition efficiencies for nicotine of 0.9 and greater that have been reported for some cigarette smokes. The available information combines to create a picture of nicotine in cigarette smoke that contradicts the traditional view that cigarette smoke PM is typically acidic, with little free-base nicotine typically present in the smoke PM phase. Government agencies interested in establishing a framework for the testing and monitoring of nicotine delivery may wish to consider requiring the measurement and publication of the PM-phase alpha(fb) values for the cigars and cigarettes marketed in their jurisdictions.
烟草烟雾是一种气溶胶,包含气态和悬浮颗粒物(PM)。这些颗粒主要是含有多种浓缩有机化合物的液滴。烟雾中的每种化合物都会在气相和颗粒相之间分配,并始终寻求气/粒平衡状态。当吸入烟草烟雾时,诸如尼古丁之类的化合物可以通过四种不同机制在呼吸道(RT)中沉积:(1)吸入烟雾气相中初始部分化合物的直接气相沉积(DGD);(2)颗粒相化合物通过蒸发进入气相然后沉积的蒸发气相沉积(EGD);(3)颗粒沉积,从沉积颗粒蒸发,然后从气相沉积(PDE);以及(4)颗粒通过扩散沉积(PDD)到RT组织中。其中三种机制(DGD、EGD和PDE)涉及从颗粒相挥发。因此,所有这些机制的相对重要性受到化合物从颗粒相挥发度的极大影响,而这是由化合物的气/粒分配常数K(p)通过其蒸气压所决定的。对于诸如苯并[a]芘这样基本上不挥发的化合物,可能只有PDD是重要的。对于诸如尼古丁这样的半挥发性化合物,所有四种机制都可能很重要。由于诸如尼古丁之类的烟草烟雾生物碱可以以质子化形式以及游离碱形式存在,颗粒相中呈中性游离碱形式的化合物分数alpha(fb)在确定这四种机制的相对重要性方面起着关键的、依赖于pH的作用。已推导出可用于确定DGD和EGD机制重要性的方程。烟草烟雾颗粒中尼古丁的alpha(fb)值由颗粒相的有效pH值pH(eff)设定。从历史上看,测量“烟雾pH值”的主要方法是将pH电极直接暴露于烟草烟雾中。这种方法无法直接洞察pH(eff)或alpha(fb)值,原因如下:(1)使用这种电极测量烟雾颗粒相pH值存在问题;(2)就其本身而言,测量烟草烟雾颗粒的pH值对于质子化和游离碱形式的尼古丁的颗粒相活度系数对尼古丁物种分布的影响毫无意义。因此,通过直接pH电极法通常测得的香烟“烟雾pH值”的“酸性”值,在确定颗粒相中质子化和游离碱形式的尼古丁的相对分布方面既不可靠也无用。尼古丁从烟草烟雾颗粒中的挥发度对alpha(fb)的依赖性意味着,通过扩散管采样器(或其他方法)在平衡条件下测量烟草烟雾中尼古丁的气/粒分布,可以得出该烟雾中尼古丁K(p)的信息。了解游离碱形式尼古丁的分配常数K(p,fb),然后可以通过K(p) = K(p,fb)/alpha(fb)的关系计算alpha(fb)。现有数据表明,一些商业香烟的烟雾颗粒可以用alpha(fb)≥0.4来表征,即40%或更多的尼古丁呈游离碱形式。这一结论与以下几点一致:(1)菲利普·莫里斯公司获得的气体采样扩散管结果,其中观察到大量烟草烟雾尼古丁沉积在酸涂层扩散管中,当香烟烟草混合物用氨处理时沉积更多;(2)一些烟草烟雾表现出的感官“影响效应”是由气态尼古丁在咽部沉积引起的观点;(3)观察到的尼古丁吸入器引起的喉咙刺激;以及(4)一些香烟烟雾中报道的尼古丁在整个呼吸道的高沉积效率,高达0.9及以上。现有信息综合起来描绘出一幅香烟烟雾中尼古丁的图景,这与传统观点相矛盾,传统观点认为香烟烟雾颗粒通常是酸性的,烟雾颗粒相中通常很少有游离碱形式的尼古丁。有兴趣建立尼古丁释放测试和监测框架的政府机构不妨考虑要求测量并公布其管辖范围内销售的雪茄和香烟的颗粒相alpha(fb)值。