Suppr超能文献

5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂治疗惊恐障碍的相对疗效及耐受性的效应量分析

An effect-size analysis of the relative efficacy and tolerability of serotonin selective reuptake inhibitors for panic disorder.

作者信息

Otto M W, Tuby K S, Gould R A, McLean R Y, Pollack M H

机构信息

Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA.

出版信息

Am J Psychiatry. 2001 Dec;158(12):1989-92. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.158.12.1989.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Serotonin selective reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are now considered the first-line pharmacotherapy for panic disorder. The preferential use and the presumption of greater tolerability of SSRIs relative to older agents, such as tricyclic antidepressants, occurred without direct comparisons between the two classes of medication. In this study the authors used an effect-size analysis to provide an initial comparison.

METHOD

The authors conducted an effect-size analysis of 12 placebo-controlled, efficacy trials of SSRIs for panic disorder and compared these results to findings obtained in a recent meta-analysis of non-SSRI treatments for panic disorder.

RESULTS

The mean effect size for acute treatment outcome for SSRIs relative to placebo was 0.55, not significantly different from that for antidepressants in general (0.55) and for imipramine in particular (0.48). More recent studies of SSRIs, and studies using larger samples, were associated with lower effect sizes. No significant differences were found in dropout rates between those taking SSRIs and those taking older agents during acute treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

An effect-size analysis of controlled studies of treatments for panic disorder revealed no significant differences between SSRIs and older antidepressants in terms of efficacy or tolerability in short-term trials. An inverse relationship was evident between sample size and effect size for SSRIs. Early studies of small samples may have led to initial overestimations of the efficacy of SSRIs for panic disorder.

摘要

目的

血清素选择性再摄取抑制剂(SSRIs)现被视为惊恐障碍的一线药物治疗方法。相对于三环类抗抑郁药等较老的药物,SSRIs的优先使用以及其耐受性更佳的推测,是在未对这两类药物进行直接比较的情况下出现的。在本研究中,作者使用效应量分析进行初步比较。

方法

作者对12项SSRIs治疗惊恐障碍的安慰剂对照疗效试验进行了效应量分析,并将这些结果与近期一项针对惊恐障碍非SSRIs治疗的荟萃分析结果进行比较。

结果

相对于安慰剂,SSRIs急性治疗结果的平均效应量为0.55,与一般抗抑郁药(0.55)尤其是丙咪嗪(0.48)的效应量无显著差异。SSRIs的近期研究以及样本量较大的研究,效应量较低。在急性治疗期间,服用SSRIs者与服用较老药物者的脱落率无显著差异。

结论

对惊恐障碍治疗的对照研究进行效应量分析发现,在短期试验中,SSRIs与较老的抗抑郁药在疗效或耐受性方面无显著差异。SSRIs的样本量与效应量之间存在明显的负相关关系。早期的小样本研究可能导致最初高估了SSRIs对惊恐障碍的疗效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验