Solecki R, Bürgin H, Buschmann J, Clark R, Duverger M, Fialkowski O, Guittin P, Hazelden K P, Hellwig J, Hoffmann E, Hofmann T, Hübel U, Khalil S, Lingk W, Mantovani A, Moxon M, Müller S, Parkinson M, Paul M, Paumgartten F, Pfeil R, Platzek T, Rauch-Ernst M, Scheevelenbos A, Seed J, Talsness C E, Yasuda M, Younes M, Chahoud I
Federal Institute for Health Protection of Consumers and Veterinary Medicine, Berlin, Germany.
Reprod Toxicol. 2001 Nov-Dec;15(6):713-21. doi: 10.1016/s0890-6238(01)00179-4.
The initial efforts of the Federal Institute for Health Protection of Consumers and Veterinary Medicine (BgVV) and the Free University of Berlin to standardise terminology in the field of developmental toxicology began in 1995. Procedures were undertaken to harmonise the terminology used by the International Federation of Teratology Societies (IFTS) and the International Programme on Chemical Safety (IPCS). This article reflects these activities and is a report on the Third Workshop on the Terminology in Developmental Toxicology held in September 2000. This Workshop served as a forum to discuss the results of a survey on the classification of skeletal anomalies that had been previously sent to scientists active in the field. Although high agreement was reached among the evaluators for several terms, the use of a number of terms was rather variable. Therefore, the discussions at the workshop among the experts from research institutions, regulatory agencies, and industry were mainly focussed on those terms for which there was disagreement and/or uncertainties and the possible reasons. Pictures provided by the participants for the illustration of "grey zone" anomalies constituted the basis for detailed discussions. In many of the cases with lower agreement, decisions were facilitated by the provision of the corresponding picture. The main reasons for lower agreement were imprecise terms, insufficient knowledge on postnatal consequences, theoretical terms that are unlikely to occur in isolation, and the possibility of observing a range of severity that might be decisive for the classification of either a malformation or variation. The attendees concluded that "grey-zone" anomalies will never disappear completely and that for the assessment, the grade of severity and/or the frequency of the observation can be decisive for the terminology chosen. A Joint IPCS/IFTS Project was proposed to further consensus of terminology and classification and to link these anomalies to pictures at different skeletal sites. In order to support the harmonisation of regulatory decisions, it was proposed to establish a "Clearinghouse" System under the umbrella of the IPCS. The Clearinghouse could be contacted either by the regulatory authorities or by any company to clarify their queries, particularly with regard to registration or authorisation processes. Finally, it was recommended to also carry out a similar survey on "soft tissue anomalies" and "external findings." The results of this survey will be discussed at a Joint IPCS/IFTS Workshop in Berlin in 2002.
联邦消费者与兽医学健康保护研究所(BgVV)和柏林自由大学于1995年开始在发育毒理学领域开展术语标准化的初步工作。采取了相关程序来协调国际致畸学协会联合会(IFTS)和国际化学品安全规划署(IPCS)所使用的术语。本文反映了这些活动,是关于2000年9月举行的第三届发育毒理学术语研讨会的报告。该研讨会作为一个论坛,用于讨论此前发送给该领域活跃科学家的骨骼异常分类调查结果。尽管评估人员对若干术语达成了高度一致,但一些术语的使用差异较大。因此,研讨会上来自研究机构、监管机构和行业的专家主要围绕那些存在分歧和/或不确定性的术语以及可能的原因展开讨论。与会者提供的用于说明“灰色地带”异常的图片构成了详细讨论的基础。在许多一致性较低的案例中,相应图片的提供有助于做出决策。一致性较低的主要原因包括术语不精确、对出生后后果的了解不足、不太可能单独出现的理论术语,以及观察到的严重程度范围可能对畸形或变异分类起决定性作用。与会者得出结论,“灰色地带”异常永远不会完全消失,对于评估而言,严重程度等级和/或观察频率可能对所选术语起决定性作用。提议开展一个IPCS/IFTS联合项目,以进一步就术语和分类达成共识,并将这些异常与不同骨骼部位的图片相关联。为支持监管决策的协调统一,提议在IPCS的框架下建立一个“信息交换所”系统。监管机构或任何公司都可以联系该信息交换所,以澄清他们的疑问,特别是关于注册或授权程序的疑问。最后,建议对“软组织异常”和“外部发现”也开展类似的调查。该调查结果将在2002年于柏林举行的IPCS/IFTS联合研讨会上进行讨论。