Suppr超能文献

患者对全科医疗服务评价的反馈:一项随机试验。

Feedback of patients' evaluations of general practice care: a randomised trial.

作者信息

Vingerhoets E, Wensing M, Grol R

机构信息

Centre for Quality of Care Research (WOK), Universities of Nijmegen and Maastricht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Qual Health Care. 2001 Dec;10(4):224-8. doi: 10.1136/qhc.0100224...

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effects of feedback of patients' evaluations of care to general practitioners.

DESIGN

Randomised trial.

SETTING

General practice in the Netherlands.

SUBJECTS

55 GPs and samples of 3691 and 3595 adult patients before and after the intervention, respectively.

INTERVENTIONS

GPs in the intervention group were given an individualised structured feedback report concerning evaluations of care provided by their own patients. Reference figures referring to other GPs were added as well as suggestions for interpretation of this feedback, an evidence-based overview of factors determining patients' evaluations of care, and methods to discuss and plan improvements.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Patients' evaluations of nine dimensions of general practice measured with the CEP, a previously validated questionnaire consisting of 64 questions, using a six point answering scale (1= poor, 6 = very good).

RESULTS

Mean scores per CEP dimension varied from 3.88 to 4.77. Multilevel regression analysis showed that, after correction for baseline scores, patients' evaluations of continuity and medical care were less positive after the intervention in the intervention group (4.60 v 4.77, p < 0.05 and 4.68 v 4.71, p < 0.05, respectively). No differences were found in the remaining seven CEP dimensions.

CONCLUSIONS

Providing feedback on patients' evaluations of care to GPs did not result in changes in their evaluation of the care received. This conclusion challenges the relevance of feedback on patients' evaluations of care for quality improvement.

摘要

目的

评估向全科医生反馈患者对医疗服务评价的效果。

设计

随机试验。

地点

荷兰的全科医疗。

研究对象

55名全科医生,干预前后分别抽取3691名和3595名成年患者作为样本。

干预措施

向干预组的全科医生提供一份关于其自身患者对医疗服务评价的个性化结构化反馈报告。报告中还加入了其他全科医生的参考数据以及对该反馈的解读建议、一份基于证据的决定患者对医疗服务评价的因素概述,以及讨论和规划改进措施的方法。

主要观察指标

使用CEP(一份先前经验证有效的包含64个问题的问卷,采用六点回答量表(1 = 差,6 = 非常好))测量患者对全科医疗九个维度的评价。

结果

CEP各维度的平均得分在3.88至4.77之间。多水平回归分析显示,在对基线得分进行校正后,干预组干预后患者对连续性和医疗服务的评价不如干预前积极(分别为4.60对4.77,p < 0.05;4.68对4.71,p < 0.05)。在其余七个CEP维度上未发现差异。

结论

向全科医生反馈患者对医疗服务的评价并未导致他们对所接受医疗服务评价的改变。这一结论对通过反馈患者对医疗服务的评价来改善质量的相关性提出了质疑。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

1
Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice.审核与反馈:对专业实践的影响
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 25;3(3):CD000259. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000259.pub4.
6
Patient-mediated interventions to improve professional practice.患者介导的干预措施以改善专业实践。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 11;9(9):CD012472. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012472.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Evidence-based patient empowerment.基于证据的患者赋权。
Qual Health Care. 2000 Dec;9(4):200-1. doi: 10.1136/qhc.9.4.200.
4
Using patient feedback for quality improvement.利用患者反馈改进医疗质量。
Qual Manag Health Care. 1996 Winter;4(2):55-67. doi: 10.1097/00019514-199600420-00008.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验