Suppr超能文献

短期记忆:对标准模型的质疑

Remembering over the short-term: the case against the standard model.

作者信息

Nairne James S

机构信息

Purdue University, Department of Psychological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907-1364, USA.

出版信息

Annu Rev Psychol. 2002;53:53-81. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135131.

Abstract

Psychologists often assume that short-term storage is synonymous with activation, a mnemonic property that keeps information in an immediately accessible form. Permanent knowledge is activated, as a result of on-line cognitive processing, and an activity trace is established "in" short-term (or working) memory. Activation is assumed to decay spontaneously with the passage of time, so a refreshing process-rehearsal-is needed to maintain availability. Most of the phenomena of immediate retention, such as capacity limitations and word length effects, are assumed to arise from trade-offs between rehearsal and decay. This "standard model" of how we remember over the short-term still enjoys considerable popularity, although recent research questions most of its main assumptions. In this chapter I review the recent research and identify the empirical and conceptual problems that plague traditional conceptions of short-term memory. Increasingly, researchers are recognizing that short-term retention is cue driven, much like long-term memory, and that neither rehearsal nor decay is likely to explain the particulars of short-term forgetting.

摘要

心理学家常常假定,短期存储等同于激活,这是一种将信息保持在即时可用形式的记忆属性。长期知识由于在线认知加工而被激活,并且在短期(或工作)记忆中建立起一个活动痕迹。激活被假定会随着时间的推移而自发衰退,因此需要一个刷新过程——复述——来维持可用性。即时记忆的大多数现象,如容量限制和词长效应,被假定源于复述和衰退之间的权衡。这种关于我们如何进行短期记忆的“标准模型”仍然相当流行,尽管最近的研究对其大多数主要假设提出了质疑。在本章中,我回顾了最近的研究,并指出困扰短期记忆传统概念的实证和概念问题。越来越多的研究者认识到,短期记忆如同长期记忆一样是由线索驱动的,而且复述和衰退都不太可能解释短期遗忘的具体情况。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验