Hishinuma E S, Miyamoto R H, Nishimura S T, Goebert D A, Yuen N Y, Makini G K, Andrade N N, Johnson R C, Carlton B S
Department of Psychiatry, John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawaii-Manoa, Honolulu 96813, USA.
J Anxiety Disord. 2001 Nov-Dec;15(6):511-33. doi: 10.1016/s0887-6185(01)00079-2.
The purpose of this study was to determine the validity of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) in predicting DSM-III-R anxiety disorders based on the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children (DISC, Version 2.3) and using Asian/Pacific Islander adolescents. An overall prevalence rate of 9.19% for generalized anxiety disorder, overanxious disorder, or social phobia was consistent with past studies. As hypothesized, STAI negatively worded (i.e., Factor 2) items were better predictors than positively stated (i.e., Factor 1) items. The STAI State mean was a better predictor of concurrent DISC anxiety disorders as compared to STAI State Factors I or 2. In contrast, the STAI Trait Factor 2 (negatively worded) composite was the best predictor for nonconcurrent DISC anxiety disorders as compared to STAI Trait Factor 1 or the overall STAI Trait subscale. Satisfactory predictive-validity values were obtained when using the STAI State mean and Trait Factor 2 composite. Implications of these findings are discussed, including using the STAI as a screening measure for ethnically diverse adolescents.
本研究的目的是基于儿童诊断访谈量表(DISC,第2.3版)并以亚太岛民青少年为对象,确定状态-特质焦虑量表(STAI)在预测《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版修订版(DSM-III-R)焦虑症方面的有效性。广泛性焦虑症、过度焦虑症或社交恐惧症的总体患病率为9.19%,与以往研究一致。正如所假设的,STAI中措辞为否定的项目(即因子2)比措辞为肯定的项目(即因子I)是更好的预测指标。与STAI状态因子I或2相比,STAI状态均值是当前DISC焦虑症更好的预测指标。相比之下,与STAI特质因子I或总体STAI特质分量表相比,STAI特质因子2(措辞为否定)综合指标是未来DISC焦虑症的最佳预测指标。使用STAI状态均值和特质因子2综合指标时,获得了令人满意的预测效度值。文中讨论了这些发现的意义,包括将STAI用作不同种族青少年的筛查工具。