• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医生/护士技能组合的经济方法:问题、陷阱及部分解决方案

Economic approaches to doctor/nurse skill mix: problems, pitfalls, and partial solutions.

作者信息

Kernick David, Scott Anthony

机构信息

St Thomas Health Centre, Exeter.

出版信息

Br J Gen Pract. 2002 Jan;52(474):42-6.

PMID:11791815
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1314200/
Abstract

Against a background of government calls for a radical change in the way the medical workforce is planned and trained, the concept of skill mix seeks to match clinical presentation to an intervention based on an appropriate level of skill and training. Health economics is not the only framework within which these changes can be analysed. However unless the economic issues are thought through clearly there is a danger that resources may be used inefficiently. The aims of this paper are to outline the economic issues in the area of doctor/nurse skill mix and the problems of obtaining correct solutions from the perspective of efficiency. It concludes by offering a pragmatic framework which can facilitate decisions in this area. Although this paper is written from the perspective of primary care, it is equally relevant to skill mix in the secondary care sector.

摘要

在政府呼吁对医疗劳动力的规划和培训方式进行彻底变革的背景下,技能组合的概念旨在根据适当的技能水平和培训,使临床表现与干预措施相匹配。卫生经济学并非分析这些变革的唯一框架。然而,除非清楚地思考经济问题,否则存在资源利用效率低下的风险。本文的目的是概述医生/护士技能组合领域的经济问题,以及从效率角度获得正确解决方案的问题。本文最后提供了一个务实的框架,以促进该领域的决策。尽管本文是从初级保健的角度撰写的,但它同样适用于二级保健部门的技能组合。

相似文献

1
Economic approaches to doctor/nurse skill mix: problems, pitfalls, and partial solutions.医生/护士技能组合的经济方法:问题、陷阱及部分解决方案
Br J Gen Pract. 2002 Jan;52(474):42-6.
2
The costs of training a nurse practitioner in primary care: the importance of allowing for the cost of education and training when making decisions about changing the professional-mix.培训一名初级保健执业护士的成本:在做出改变专业组合的决策时考虑教育和培训成本的重要性。
J Nurs Manag. 2007 May;15(4):449-57. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2007.00668.x.
3
Developing intermediate care provided by general practitioners with a special interest: the economic perspective.由全科医生提供的具有特殊兴趣的中级护理服务的发展:经济学视角。
Br J Gen Pract. 2003 Jul;53(492):553-6.
4
Is there an economic case for investing in nursing care--what does the literature tell us?投资护理服务在经济上是否合理——文献告诉了我们什么?
J Adv Nurs. 2015 May;71(5):975-90. doi: 10.1111/jan.12577. Epub 2014 Nov 27.
5
Identifying, evaluating and implementing cost-effective skill mix.识别、评估并实施具有成本效益的技能组合。
J Nurs Manag. 1999 Sep;7(5):265-70. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2834.1999.00137.x.
6
Collaborative practice.协作实践。
Med Group Manage J. 1994 Nov-Dec;41(6):12, 14, 16 passim.
7
Staffing, skill mix and the model of care.人员配备、技能组合与护理模式。
J Clin Nurs. 2010 Aug;19(15-16):2242-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03225.x.
8
Staffing costs in primary health care.初级卫生保健中的人员配置成本。
J R Soc Health. 1984 Jun;104(3):108-10. doi: 10.1177/146642408410400307.
9
Skill mix, doctors and nurses: substitution or diversification?技能组合、医生与护士:替代还是多样化?
J Manag Med. 2002;16(4-5):259-70. doi: 10.1108/02689230210445086.
10
[Economic impact of the physician/nurse substitution in community health care sector].[社区卫生保健部门医生/护士替代的经济影响]
Rev Infirm. 2002 Nov(85):20-3.

引用本文的文献

1
How does the quality of care for type 2 diabetic patients benefit from GPs-nurses' teamwork? A staggered difference-in-differences design based on a French pilot program.2 型糖尿病患者的护理质量如何从全科医生-护士团队合作中受益?基于法国试点项目的双重差分设计。
Int J Health Econ Manag. 2023 Sep;23(3):433-466. doi: 10.1007/s10754-023-09354-z. Epub 2023 Apr 27.
2
Skill-mix change and the general practice workforce challenge.技能组合变化与全科医疗劳动力挑战。
Br J Gen Pract. 2018 Apr;68(669):176. doi: 10.3399/bjgp18X695429.
3
Comparing the cost of nurse practitioners and GPs in primary care: modelling economic data from randomised trials.比较初级保健中执业护士和全科医生的成本:对随机试验的经济数据进行建模。
Br J Gen Pract. 2006 Jul;56(528):530-5.
4
Impact of nurse practitioners on workload of general practitioners: randomised controlled trial.执业护士对全科医生工作量的影响:随机对照试验。
BMJ. 2004 Apr 17;328(7445):927. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38041.493519.EE. Epub 2004 Apr 6.
5
Systematic review of whether nurse practitioners working in primary care can provide equivalent care to doctors.对从事初级保健工作的执业护士是否能提供与医生同等护理的系统评价。
BMJ. 2002 Apr 6;324(7341):819-23. doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7341.819.

本文引用的文献

1
Costs are as important as outcomes.成本与结果同样重要。
BMJ. 2000 Sep 2;321(7260):567.
2
A cost consequence study of the impact of a dermatology-trained practice nurse on the quality of life of primary care patients with eczema and psoriasis.一项关于皮肤科培训的执业护士对湿疹和银屑病初级护理患者生活质量影响的成本后果研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2000 Jul;50(456):555-8.
3
Costing interventions in primary care.基层医疗中的成本核算干预措施。
Fam Pract. 2000 Feb;17(1):66-70. doi: 10.1093/fampra/17.1.66.
4
The role of cost-consequence analysis in healthcare decision-making.成本-后果分析在医疗保健决策中的作用。
Pharmacoeconomics. 1998 Mar;13(3):277-88. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199813030-00002.
5
Assessing the benefits of health care: how far should we go?评估医疗保健的益处:我们应该走多远?
Qual Health Care. 1995 Sep;4(3):207-13. doi: 10.1136/qshc.4.3.207.
6
What does a GP consultation cost?看一次全科医生要花多少钱?
Br J Gen Pract. 1997 Mar;47(416):170-2.
7
Bringing nurses and doctors closer together.拉近护士与医生之间的距离。
BMJ. 1997 Mar 1;314(7081):617-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7081.617.
8
Marginal costs and benefits.边际成本与收益。
BMJ. 1996 Jan 6;312(7022):35-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7022.35.
9
Comparing healthcare outcomes.比较医疗保健结果。
BMJ. 1994 Jun 4;308(6942):1493-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6942.1493.
10
Evaluating the clinical nurse specialist. A review.评估临床护理专家:一篇综述
Int J Nurs Stud. 1994 Dec;31(6):561-71. doi: 10.1016/0020-7489(94)90066-3.