• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较医疗保健结果。

Comparing healthcare outcomes.

作者信息

Orchard C

机构信息

National Casemix Office, Information Management Group of the NHS Executive, Winchester, Hampshire.

出版信息

BMJ. 1994 Jun 4;308(6942):1493-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6942.1493.

DOI:10.1136/bmj.308.6942.1493
PMID:8019285
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2540294/
Abstract

Governments are increasingly concerned to compare the quality and effectiveness of healthcare interventions but find this a complex matter. Crude hospital statistics can be dangerously misleading and need adjusting for case mix, but identifying and weighting the patient characteristics which affect prognosis are problematical for conceptual, methodological, and practical reasons. These include the inherently uncertain nature of prognosis itself and the practical difficulties of collecting and quantifying data on the outcomes of interest for specific healthcare interventions and known risk factors such as severity.

摘要

各国政府越来越关注比较医疗干预措施的质量和效果,但发现这是一个复杂的问题。粗略的医院统计数据可能会产生严重的误导,需要根据病例组合进行调整,但出于概念、方法和实际原因,确定影响预后的患者特征并对其进行加权是有问题的。这些问题包括预后本身固有的不确定性,以及收集和量化特定医疗干预措施的相关结果以及诸如病情严重程度等已知风险因素的数据时所面临的实际困难。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bbee/2540294/4ccf4abc7ee5/bmj00443-0050-a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bbee/2540294/4ccf4abc7ee5/bmj00443-0050-a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bbee/2540294/4ccf4abc7ee5/bmj00443-0050-a.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparing healthcare outcomes.比较医疗保健结果。
BMJ. 1994 Jun 4;308(6942):1493-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6942.1493.
2
Designing and using case mix indices.
Manag Care Q. 1994 Summer;2(3):1-11.
3
Measuring the effects of casemix on outcomes.衡量病例组合对治疗结果的影响。
J Eval Clin Pract. 1996 May;2(2):111-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.1996.tb00035.x.
4
Evaluating prognostic factors: implications for measurement of health care outcome.评估预后因素:对医疗保健结果测量的影响
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1992 Aug;46(4):323-6. doi: 10.1136/jech.46.4.323.
5
Interpreting health outcomes.解读健康结果。
J Eval Clin Pract. 1997 Aug;3(3):187-99. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2753.1997.00003.x.
6
Intensive Care Society's APACHE II study in Britain and Ireland--I: Variations in case mix of adult admissions to general intensive care units and impact on outcome.重症监护协会在英国和爱尔兰开展的急性生理学及慢性健康状况评分系统(APACHE II)研究——I:成人入住综合重症监护病房病例组合的差异及其对预后的影响
BMJ. 1993 Oct 16;307(6910):972-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.307.6910.972.
7
Risk adjustment of ischemic stroke outcomes for comparing hospital performance: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association.比较医院绩效的缺血性脑卒中结局风险调整:美国心脏协会/美国卒中协会的医疗保健专业人员声明。
Stroke. 2014 Mar;45(3):918-44. doi: 10.1161/01.str.0000441948.35804.77. Epub 2014 Jan 23.
8
Growing demand for accurate coded data in new healthcare delivery era.在新的医疗服务时代,对准确编码数据的需求不断增长。
J AHIMA. 1996 Jan;68(1):42-7; quiz 49-50.
9
Symposium: case-mix measurement and assessing quality of hospital care.专题研讨会:病例组合测量与医院护理质量评估
Health Care Financ Rev. 1987 Dec;Spec No:39-48.
10
Intensive Care Society's APACHE II study in Britain and Ireland--II: Outcome comparisons of intensive care units after adjustment for case mix by the American APACHE II method.重症监护学会在英国和爱尔兰开展的急性生理学及慢性健康状况评分系统(APACHE II)研究——II:采用美国APACHE II方法对病例组合进行调整后各重症监护病房的结局比较
BMJ. 1993 Oct 16;307(6910):977-81. doi: 10.1136/bmj.307.6910.977.

引用本文的文献

1
A Core Outcome Set for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: Development and Recommendations for Implementation in Clinical Practice Through an International Multi-stakeholder Consensus Process.炎症性肠病核心结局集:通过国际多利益相关者共识过程制定和推荐在临床实践中的实施
J Crohns Colitis. 2024 Oct 15;18(10):1583-1595. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad195.
2
Measuring the quality of skin cancer management in primary care: A scoping review.测量初级保健中皮肤癌管理的质量:范围综述。
Australas J Dermatol. 2023 May;64(2):177-193. doi: 10.1111/ajd.14023. Epub 2023 Mar 24.
3
Implication of excessive length of stay of asthma patient with heterogenous status attributed to air pollution.

本文引用的文献

1
Hospital case mix: its definition, measurement and use. Part II: Review of alternative measures.
Med Care Rev. 1982 Summer;39(2):73-123. doi: 10.1177/107755878203900201.
2
The language of health.健康的语言。
BMJ. 1993 Jan 30;306(6873):287-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.306.6873.287.
3
The new information management and technology strategy of the NHS.英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)的新信息管理与技术战略。
BMJ. 1993 Jul 24;307(6898):217. doi: 10.1136/bmj.307.6898.217.
空气污染导致哮喘患者状况各异,住院时间过长带来的影响。
J Environ Health Sci Eng. 2021 Jan 7;19(1):95-106. doi: 10.1007/s40201-020-00584-8. eCollection 2021 Jun.
4
Measuring Outcomes of Psychological Well-Being within Paediatric Health Settings.衡量儿科健康环境中心理幸福感的结果。
Healthcare (Basel). 2017 Dec 29;6(1):1. doi: 10.3390/healthcare6010001.
5
Significant variation in mortality and functional outcome after acute ischaemic stroke between Western countries: data from the tinzaparin in acute ischaemic stroke trial (TAIST).西方国家急性缺血性卒中后死亡率和功能结局的显著差异:来自急性缺血性卒中替奈普酶试验(TAIST)的数据。
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2006 Mar;77(3):327-33. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2005.064600. Epub 2005 Jul 26.
6
Stroke care: how do we measure quality?中风护理:我们如何衡量质量?
Postgrad Med J. 2002 Jun;78(920):322-6. doi: 10.1136/pmj.78.920.322.
7
Economic approaches to doctor/nurse skill mix: problems, pitfalls, and partial solutions.医生/护士技能组合的经济方法:问题、陷阱及部分解决方案
Br J Gen Pract. 2002 Jan;52(474):42-6.
8
Mortality after acute myocardial infarction is lower in metropolitan regions than in non-metropolitan regions.急性心肌梗死后的死亡率在大都市地区低于非大都市地区。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2000 Aug;54(8):590-5. doi: 10.1136/jech.54.8.590.
9
Explaining differences in English hospital death rates using routinely collected data.利用常规收集的数据解释英国医院死亡率的差异。
BMJ. 1999 Jun 5;318(7197):1515-20. doi: 10.1136/bmj.318.7197.1515.
10
Survival and treatment of AIDS patients 1984-1993: experience of a smaller east London HIV centre.1984 - 1993年艾滋病患者的生存与治疗:伦敦东部一家小型艾滋病病毒中心的经验
Genitourin Med. 1997 Feb;73(1):44-8. doi: 10.1136/sti.73.1.44.
4
Outcomes in intensive care.重症监护的治疗结果。
BMJ. 1993 Oct 16;307(6910):953-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.307.6910.953.
5
APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system.急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统II:一种疾病严重程度分类系统。
Crit Care Med. 1985 Oct;13(10):818-29.
6
The quality of care. How can it be assessed?护理质量。如何对其进行评估?
JAMA. 1988;260(12):1743-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.260.12.1743.
7
Using administrative data from Manitoba, Canada to study treatment outcomes: developing control groups and adjusting for case severity.利用加拿大曼尼托巴省的行政数据研究治疗结果:建立对照组并对病例严重程度进行调整。
Soc Sci Med. 1989;28(2):109-13. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(89)90137-8.
8
Severity of illness measures. Comments and caveats.疾病严重程度测量。评论与注意事项。
Med Care. 1990 Sep;28(9):757-61. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199009000-00001.
9
Biased estimates of expected acute myocardial infarction mortality using MedisGroups admission severity groups.使用MedisGroups入院严重程度分组对预期急性心肌梗死死亡率的偏差估计。
JAMA. 1991 Jun 12;265(22):2965-70.
10
Defining clinical improvement in rheumatoid arthritis.定义类风湿关节炎的临床改善情况。
Arthritis Rheum. 1991 Apr;34(4):499-500. doi: 10.1002/art.1780340420.