Gardiner John M, Ramponi Cristina, Richardson-Klavehn Alan
Psychology Group, School of Cognitive & Computing Sciences, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton, UK.
Memory. 2002 Mar;10(2):83-98. doi: 10.1080/09658210143000281.
A meta-analysis of proportions of remember, know, and guess responses was carried out on observations from 86 experimental conditions in 23 different recognition memory experiments. Unlike remember and know responses, guess responses revealed no memory for the test items that elicited them. A signal detection analysis of these data showed that A' estimates of the strength of the memory trace depended on response criteria. A' estimates increased significantly when know responses were added to remember responses, and decreased significantly when guess responses were added to remember and know responses. It was guessing, rather than knowing, that was most strongly correlated with overall response criteria. Nor were remembering and knowing correlated significantly. These results do not support a quantitative trace strength model according to which these responses merely reflect different response criteria. They support theories that ascribe remembering and knowing to qualitatively distinct memory systems or processes.
对来自23个不同识别记忆实验的86种实验条件下的观察结果进行了关于记住、知道和猜测反应比例的荟萃分析。与记住和知道反应不同,猜测反应并未显示出对引发它们的测试项目的记忆。对这些数据的信号检测分析表明,记忆痕迹强度的A'估计值取决于反应标准。当将知道反应添加到记住反应中时,A'估计值显著增加,而当将猜测反应添加到记住和知道反应中时,A'估计值显著下降。与总体反应标准相关性最强的是猜测,而不是知道。记住和知道之间也没有显著相关性。这些结果不支持定量痕迹强度模型,即这些反应仅仅反映不同的反应标准。它们支持将记住和知道归因于质上不同的记忆系统或过程的理论。