• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

记忆、知晓和猜测的体验。

Experiences of remembering, knowing, and guessing.

作者信息

Gardiner J M, Ramponi C, Richardson-Klavehn A

机构信息

Department of Psychology, City University, London, EC1V 0HB, England.

出版信息

Conscious Cogn. 1998 Mar;7(1):1-26. doi: 10.1006/ccog.1997.0321.

DOI:10.1006/ccog.1997.0321
PMID:9521829
Abstract

This article presents and discusses transcripts of some 270 explanations subjects provided subsequently for recognition memory decisions that had been associated with remember, know, or guess responses at the time the recognition decisions were made. Only transcripts for remember responses included reports of recollective experiences, which seemed mostly to reflect either effortful elaborative encoding or involuntary reminding at study, especially in relation to the self. Transcripts for know responses included claims of just knowing, and of feelings of familiarity. These transcripts indicated that subjects were often quite confident of the accuracy of their decisions, compared with those for guess responses. Transcripts for decisions associated with guess responses also expressed feelings of familiarity but additionally revealed various strategies and inferences that did not directly reflect memory for studied items. The article concludes with a historical and theoretical overview of some interpretations of the states of awareness measured by these responses.

摘要

本文展示并讨论了约270份解释记录,这些记录是受试者后来针对识别记忆决策提供的,这些决策在做出识别决策时曾与记得、知道或猜测反应相关联。只有与记得反应相关的记录包含了回忆体验的报告,这些报告似乎大多反映了学习时的刻意精细编码或非自愿提醒,尤其是与自我相关的。与知道反应相关的记录包含了只是知道以及熟悉感的说法。这些记录表明,与猜测反应的记录相比,受试者通常对自己决策的准确性相当有信心。与猜测反应相关的决策记录也表达了熟悉感,但还揭示了各种并非直接反映对所学项目记忆的策略和推断。本文最后对这些反应所测量的意识状态的一些解释进行了历史和理论概述。

相似文献

1
Experiences of remembering, knowing, and guessing.记忆、知晓和猜测的体验。
Conscious Cogn. 1998 Mar;7(1):1-26. doi: 10.1006/ccog.1997.0321.
2
Recognition memory and decision processes: a meta-analysis of remember, know, and guess responses.识别记忆与决策过程:对“记得”“知道”和“猜测”反应的元分析
Memory. 2002 Mar;10(2):83-98. doi: 10.1080/09658210143000281.
3
Functional aspects of recollective experience in face recognition.人脸识别中回忆性体验的功能方面。
Conscious Cogn. 1995 Dec;4(4):387-98. doi: 10.1006/ccog.1995.1046.
4
Measuring the speed of the conscious components of recognition memory: remembering is faster than knowing.测量识别记忆中意识成分的速度:回忆比知晓更快。
Conscious Cogn. 2006 Mar;15(1):147-62. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2005.05.002. Epub 2005 Jul 12.
5
The influence of instructions and terminology on the accuracy of remember-know judgments.指示与术语对“记得—知道”判断准确性的影响。
Conscious Cogn. 2009 Jun;18(2):401-13. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2009.02.010. Epub 2009 Mar 31.
6
Remember/know judgments probe degrees of recollection.记忆/知晓判断探究回忆程度。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2008 Mar;20(3):400-5. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2008.20041.
7
On interpreting the relationship between remember-know judgments and confidence: the role of instructions.论记忆知晓判断与信心之间关系的解读:指导语的作用
Conscious Cogn. 2009 Sep;18(3):701-9. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2009.04.010. Epub 2009 May 23.
8
Functional-anatomic correlates of remembering and knowing.记忆与知晓的功能-解剖学关联
Neuroimage. 2004 Apr;21(4):1337-49. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.11.001.
9
Cognitive effort and recollective experience in recognition memory.识别记忆中的认知努力与回忆体验。
Memory. 1999 Mar;7(2):129-46. doi: 10.1080/741944067.
10
The effects of environmental context on recognition memory and claims of remembering.环境背景对识别记忆及记忆宣称的影响。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2008 Nov;34(6):1412-29. doi: 10.1037/a0013016.

引用本文的文献

1
Disentangling emotional source memory: a mega-analysis on the effects of emotion on item-context binding in episodic long-term memory.解析情绪源记忆:关于情绪对情景长期记忆中项目-情境绑定影响的元分析。
Front Psychol. 2024 Dec 30;15:1459617. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1459617. eCollection 2024.
2
Decoding episodic autobiographical memory in naturalistic virtual reality.在自然主义虚拟现实中解码情景自传体记忆。
Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 27;14(1):25639. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-76944-3.
3
Detecting recollection: Human evaluators can successfully assess the veracity of others' memories.
检测回忆:人类评估者可以成功评估他人记忆的真实性。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 May 28;121(22):e2310979121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2310979121. Epub 2024 May 23.
4
A conceptual-perceptual distinctiveness processing account of the superior recognition memory of pictures over environmental sounds.图片的识别记忆优于环境声音的概念-知觉独特性加工解释。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2024 Jul;77(7):1555-1580. doi: 10.1177/17470218231202986. Epub 2023 Oct 17.
5
Responsible attention: the effect of divided attention on metacognition and responsible remembering.负责的注意:分散注意对元认知和负责的记忆的影响。
Psychol Res. 2023 Jun;87(4):1085-1100. doi: 10.1007/s00426-022-01711-w. Epub 2022 Jul 15.
6
The Distinctive Pattern of Declarative Memories in Autism Spectrum Disorder: Further Evidence of Episodic Memory Constraints.自闭症谱系障碍中陈述性记忆的独特模式:情节记忆限制的进一步证据。
J Autism Dev Disord. 2023 Aug;53(8):3012-3022. doi: 10.1007/s10803-022-05579-y. Epub 2022 May 26.
7
Conceptual metaphors influence memory automatically: Evidence from a divided attention false memory task.概念隐喻自动影响记忆:来自分散注意虚假记忆任务的证据。
Mem Cognit. 2022 Aug;50(6):1336-1349. doi: 10.3758/s13421-022-01322-1. Epub 2022 May 25.
8
I remember it like it was yesterday: Age-related differences in the subjective experience of remembering.我记得就像昨天发生的一样:与年龄相关的记忆主观体验差异。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2022 Aug;29(4):1223-1245. doi: 10.3758/s13423-021-02048-y. Epub 2021 Dec 16.
9
The dynamics of memory for United States presidents in younger and older adults.老年人和年轻人对美国总统记忆的动态变化。
Memory. 2021 Oct;29(9):1232-1244. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2021.1974050. Epub 2021 Sep 6.
10
Conceptual knowledge modulates memory recognition of common items: The selective role of item-typicality.概念知识调节常见物品记忆识别:项目典型性的选择性作用。
Mem Cognit. 2022 Jan;50(1):77-94. doi: 10.3758/s13421-021-01213-x. Epub 2021 Aug 6.