Suppr超能文献

症状评分中的决策逻辑(作者译)

[The logic of decision in symptom rating (author's transl)].

作者信息

Baumann U, Schnidewing G, Angst J, Helmchen H, Hippius H

出版信息

Arch Psychiatr Nervenkr (1970). 1975 Sep 18;220(3):225-35. doi: 10.1007/BF00342331.

Abstract

The rating systems used in psychiatry consider sometimes different ways of classifying parameters, such as the valuability and the certainty of decision. Those two parameters have been analysed by means of the AMP-ratings of two samples (Berlin: 1879 patients, Zürich: 786 patients). We have found that the reply "not valuable" appears much less frequently than the reply "questionable valuable". For delusional symptoms and disorders of perception the certainty of decision is lowest. The various analyses carried out lead us to the conclusion that without loosing informatory value of any consequence we can renounce any separate documentation on valuability and certainty of decision.

摘要

精神病学中使用的评级系统有时会考虑对参数进行不同的分类方式,例如决策的价值性和确定性。通过对两个样本(柏林:1879名患者,苏黎世:786名患者)的AMP评级对这两个参数进行了分析。我们发现,“无价值”的回答出现的频率远低于“价值存疑”的回答。对于妄想症状和感知障碍,决策的确定性最低。进行的各种分析使我们得出结论,在不损失任何重要信息价值的情况下,我们可以放弃对决策的价值性和确定性进行任何单独记录。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验