Busch H, Fähndrich E, Freudenthal K, Renfordt E
Pharmakopsychiatr Neuropsychopharmakol. 1975 Jul;8(4):170-5. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1094456.
During two days in November 1974 TV-tapes of psychiatric interviews were demonstrated and the psychopathology was documented on AMP-record sheet 3. It was a purpose of the discussion to get stimulation for the improvement of the AMP-manual and to decrease the interrater-variance. It was only the first tape which was not followed by a discussion. This film was presented a second time at the end of the seminar in order to examine the training effects. Both record-sheets were compared with each other. Generally the variance decreased. The discussion as to an improvement of the AMP-manual lead to the following suggestions: In defining a psychopathological item it is important to differentiate more precisely between the patient's subjective experience and his behaviour, to find better criteria concerning the rating of different intensities and to improve discrimination between singular items. Furthermore the logic of documentation procedure should be unequivocal and more practical. Following the seminar there was a symposion discussion more general and some specific methodological problems of the further development of the AMP-system. Finally study groups were formed to elaborate on the topics "AMP-manual", "rater-training", "social data" and "electronic data processing".
1974年11月的两天里，播放了精神病学访谈的电视录像，并将精神病理学记录在AMP记录表3上。讨论的一个目的是为改进AMP手册提供激励，并减少评分者之间的差异。只有第一盘录像带之后没有进行讨论。这部影片在研讨会结束时再次播放，以检验培训效果。将两张记录表相互比较。总体而言，差异有所减小。关于改进AMP手册的讨论产生了以下建议：在定义精神病理学项目时，更精确地区分患者的主观体验和行为、找到关于不同强度评分的更好标准以及改善单个项目之间的区分非常重要。此外，记录程序的逻辑应该明确且更实用。研讨会之后进行了一场更具普遍性的专题讨论会，讨论了AMP系统进一步发展的一些具体方法问题。最后成立了研究小组，以详细阐述“AMP手册”、“评分者培训”、“社会数据”和“电子数据处理”等主题。
