Di Bonaventura Giovanni, D'Antonio Domenico, Catamo Giovanni, Ballone Enzo, Piccolomini Raffaele
Department of Biomedical Sciences, Laboratory of Clinical Microbiology, G. D'Annunzio University, Via dei Vestini 31, I-66100, Chieti, Italy.
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2002 Feb;19(2):147-54. doi: 10.1016/s0924-8579(01)00483-6.
The susceptibility to levofloxacin of 194 consecutive staphylococcal (45 Staphylococcus aureus and 149 coagulase-negative staphylococci) isolates from neutropenic patients was determined by Etest and the results compared with those obtained using NCCLS-methods (broth microdilution, agar dilution and disk diffusion). Overall agreement at +/- 1log(2) dilution for Etest compared with broth microdilution and agar dilution was 99.0 and 83.5%, respectively. The Etest category agreement with broth microdilution and disk diffusion was 95.9 and 89.7%, respectively. Comparison of categories with Etest and agar dilution method gave only 67.0% absolute categorical agreement, with 29.9% minor errors and 10.7% major errors. No very major errors occurred by the four methods tested. Our results show that Etest is a valid alternative to the reference NCCLS-methods for monitoring the clinical usefulness of levofloxacin against staphylococci isolates from neutropenic patients.
采用Etest法测定了194株来自中性粒细胞减少患者的葡萄球菌(45株金黄色葡萄球菌和149株凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌)对左氧氟沙星的敏感性,并将结果与使用NCCLS方法(肉汤微量稀释法、琼脂稀释法和纸片扩散法)获得的结果进行比较。与肉汤微量稀释法和琼脂稀释法相比,Etest法在±1log(2)稀释度时的总体一致性分别为99.0%和83.5%。Etest法与肉汤微量稀释法和纸片扩散法的类别一致性分别为95.9%和89.7%。Etest法与琼脂稀释法的类别比较仅得出67.0%的绝对类别一致性,其中29.9%为轻微误差,10.7%为主要误差。在所测试的四种方法中均未出现非常重大的误差。我们的结果表明,对于监测左氧氟沙星对中性粒细胞减少患者葡萄球菌分离株的临床有效性,Etest法是参考NCCLS方法的一种有效替代方法。