Suppr超能文献

琼脂稀释法、纸片扩散法、MicroScan法和Vitek法与肉汤微量稀释法检测肠杆菌科耐氟喹诺酮类菌株的比较

Comparison of agar dilution, disk diffusion, MicroScan, and Vitek antimicrobial susceptibility testing methods to broth microdilution for detection of fluoroquinolone-resistant isolates of the family Enterobacteriaceae.

作者信息

Steward C D, Stocker S A, Swenson J M, O'Hara C M, Edwards J R, Gaynes R P, McGowan J E, Tenover F C

机构信息

Hospital Infections Program, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia 30333, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 1999 Mar;37(3):544-7. doi: 10.1128/JCM.37.3.544-547.1999.

Abstract

Fluoroquinolone resistance appears to be increasing in many species of bacteria, particularly in those causing nosocomial infections. However, the accuracy of some antimicrobial susceptibility testing methods for detecting fluoroquinolone resistance remains uncertain. Therefore, we compared the accuracy of the results of agar dilution, disk diffusion, MicroScan Walk Away Neg Combo 15 conventional panels, and Vitek GNS-F7 cards to the accuracy of the results of the broth microdilution reference method for detection of ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin resistance in 195 clinical isolates of the family Enterobacteriaceae collected from six U.S. hospitals for a national surveillance project (Project ICARE [Intensive Care Antimicrobial Resistance Epidemiology]). For ciprofloxacin, very major error rates were 0% (disk diffusion and MicroScan), 0.9% (agar dilution), and 2.7% (Vitek), while major error rates ranged from 0% (agar dilution) to 3.7% (MicroScan and Vitek). Minor error rates ranged from 12.3% (agar dilution) to 20.5% (MicroScan). For ofloxacin, no very major errors were observed, and major errors were noted only with MicroScan (3.7% major error rate). Minor error rates ranged from 8.2% (agar dilution) to 18.5% (Vitek). Minor errors for all methods were substantially reduced when results with MICs within +/-1 dilution of the broth microdilution reference MIC were excluded from analysis. However, the high number of minor errors by all test systems remains a concern.

摘要

在许多细菌种类中,氟喹诺酮耐药性似乎正在增加,尤其是在那些引起医院感染的细菌中。然而,一些用于检测氟喹诺酮耐药性的抗菌药物敏感性测试方法的准确性仍不确定。因此,我们将琼脂稀释法、纸片扩散法、MicroScan Walk Away Neg Combo 15常规板条法和Vitek GNS-F7卡片法的检测结果准确性,与肉汤微量稀释参考方法的结果准确性进行了比较,以检测从美国六家医院收集的195株肠杆菌科临床分离株对环丙沙星和氧氟沙星的耐药性,该研究是一项全国性监测项目(ICARE项目[重症监护抗菌药物耐药性流行病学])的一部分。对于环丙沙星,极重大错误率分别为0%(纸片扩散法和MicroScan法)、0.9%(琼脂稀释法)和2.7%(Vitek法),而重大错误率范围为0%(琼脂稀释法)至3.7%(MicroScan法和Vitek法)。微小错误率范围为12.3%(琼脂稀释法)至20.5%(MicroScan法)。对于氧氟沙星,未观察到极重大错误,仅MicroScan法存在重大错误(重大错误率为3.7%)。微小错误率范围为8.2%(琼脂稀释法)至18.5%(Vitek法)。当分析中排除肉汤微量稀释参考MIC值±1个稀释度范围内的MIC结果时,所有方法的微小错误均大幅减少。然而,所有检测系统的大量微小错误仍然令人担忧。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

4
DNA gyrase, topoisomerase IV, and the 4-quinolones.DNA 回旋酶、拓扑异构酶IV与4-喹诺酮类药物。
Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 1997 Sep;61(3):377-92. doi: 10.1128/mmbr.61.3.377-392.1997.
6
Trends in bacterial resistance to fluoroquinolones.氟喹诺酮类药物的细菌耐药性趋势。
Clin Infect Dis. 1997 Jan;24 Suppl 1:S67-73. doi: 10.1093/clinids/24.supplement_1.s67.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验