Clark C L, Jacobs M R, Appelbaum P C
Department of Pathology, Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania 17033, USA.
J Clin Microbiol. 1998 Dec;36(12):3579-84. doi: 10.1128/JCM.36.12.3579-3584.1998.
The activities of levofloxacin and clarithromycin against 199 penicillin- and macrolide-susceptible and -resistant pneumococci were tested by agar and microdilution methods in air and by disk diffusion and E-test methods in air and CO2. For levofloxacin, >/=99. 0% of strains were susceptible at </=2.0 microgram/ml with zone diameters of >/=17 mm, regardless of incubation in air or CO2. Although zone sizes were smaller and E-test MICs were higher for clarithromycin in CO2 than those in air, category differences were minor, and susceptibility rates for clarithromycin were similar to those obtained by agar and microdilution in air (range, 76.9 to 80.9% by all methods). For clarithromycin, adjustment of breakpoints based upon distribution of results resulted in susceptibility rates which were similar by all methods (75.8 to 76.9% susceptible, 0 to 1.5% intermediate, 22.6 to 23.1% resistant). Minor discrepancies were obtained with levofloxacin for one strain (0.5%) by microdilution and two strains (1.0%) by disk diffusion in CO2. For clarithromycin, minor discrepancies were found in three strains (1.5%) by microdilution, seven strains (3.5%) by agar dilution, four strains (2.0%) by E-test in air, six strains (3.0%) by disk diffusion in air, and five strains (2.5%) by disk diffusion in CO2. Major discrepancies occurred with levofloxacin in one strain (0.5%) by microdilution but were not found with clarithromycin. Very major discrepancies were not seen with levofloxacin, but occurred with clarithromycin in five strains (2.5%) by microdilution, three strains (1.5%) by agar dilution, two strains (1.0%) by E-test in air, eight strains (4.0%) by disk diffusion in air, and one strain (0.5%) by disk diffusion in CO2.
采用琼脂法和微量稀释法在空气中以及纸片扩散法和E试验法在空气和二氧化碳环境中,检测了左氧氟沙星和克拉霉素对199株对青霉素和大环内酯敏感及耐药的肺炎球菌的活性。对于左氧氟沙星,无论在空气中还是二氧化碳环境中培养,当浓度≤2.0微克/毫升且抑菌圈直径≥17毫米时,≥99.0%的菌株敏感。虽然在二氧化碳环境中克拉霉素的抑菌圈大小较小且E试验最低抑菌浓度较高,但类别差异较小,克拉霉素的敏感率与在空气中通过琼脂法和微量稀释法获得的结果相似(所有方法的敏感率范围为76.9%至80.9%)。对于克拉霉素,根据结果分布调整断点后,所有方法的敏感率相似(敏感率为75.8%至76.9%,中介率为0至1.5%,耐药率为22.6%至23.1%)。在二氧化碳环境中,左氧氟沙星通过微量稀释法对1株菌株(0.5%)以及通过纸片扩散法对2株菌株(1.0%)出现了微小差异。对于克拉霉素,通过微量稀释法在3株菌株(1.5%)中、通过琼脂稀释法在7株菌株(3.5%)中、在空气中通过E试验法在4株菌株(2.0%)中、在空气中通过纸片扩散法在6株菌株(3.0%)中以及在二氧化碳环境中通过纸片扩散法在5株菌株(2.5%)中发现了微小差异。左氧氟沙星通过微量稀释法在1株菌株(0.5%)中出现了重大差异,但克拉霉素未出现。左氧氟沙星未出现极重大差异,但克拉霉素通过微量稀释法在5株菌株(2.5%)中、通过琼脂稀释法在3株菌株(1.5%)中、在空气中通过E试验法在2株菌株(1.0%)中、在空气中通过纸片扩散法在8株菌株(4.0%)中以及在二氧化碳环境中通过纸片扩散法在1株菌株(0.5%)中出现了极重大差异。