Suppr超能文献

男孩持续性严重犯罪解释中的风险与促进因素

Risk and promotive effects in the explanation of persistent serious delinquency in boys.

作者信息

Stouthamer-Loeber Magda, Loeber Rolf, Wei Evelyn, Farrington David P, Wikströrm Per-Olof H

机构信息

Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic, University of Pittsburgh Medical School, Pennsylvania 15213, USA.

出版信息

J Consult Clin Psychol. 2002 Feb;70(1):111-23. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.70.1.111.

Abstract

Risk and promotive effects were investigated as predictors of persistent serious delinquency in male participants of the Pittsburgh Youth Study (R. Loeber, D. P. Farrington, M. Stouthamer-Loeber, & W. B. van Kammen, 1998), living in different neighborhoods. Participants were studied over ages 13-19 years for the oldest sample and 7-13 years for the youngest sample. Risk and promotive effects were studied in 6 domains: child behavior, child attitudes, school and leisure activities, peer behaviors, family functioning, and demographics. Regression models improved when promotive effects were included with risk effects in predicting persistent serious delinquency. Disadvantaged neighborhoods, compared with better neighborhoods, had a higher prevalence of risk effects and a lower prevalence of promotive effects. However, predictive relations between risk and promotive effects and persistent serious delinquency were linear and similar across neighborhood socioeconomic status.

摘要

在匹兹堡青少年研究(R. 勒伯、D. P. 法林顿、M. 斯托特哈默 - 勒伯和W. B. 范卡门,1998年)的男性参与者中,研究了风险因素和促进因素作为持续性严重犯罪预测指标的情况,这些参与者生活在不同社区。对年龄最大样本的参与者从13岁至19岁进行研究,对年龄最小样本的参与者从7岁至13岁进行研究。在六个领域研究了风险因素和促进因素:儿童行为、儿童态度、学校和休闲活动、同伴行为、家庭功能和人口统计学特征。在预测持续性严重犯罪时,将促进因素与风险因素一起纳入时,回归模型有所改进。与条件较好的社区相比,处境不利的社区风险因素的患病率较高,促进因素的患病率较低。然而,风险因素和促进因素与持续性严重犯罪之间的预测关系是线性的,并且在不同社区社会经济地位中相似。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验