Martin Roger L
Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto.
Harv Bus Rev. 2002 Mar;80(3):68-75, 132.
Executives who want to make their organizations better corporate citizens face many obstacles: If they undertake costly initiatives that their rivals don't embrace, they risk eroding their company's competitive position. If they invite government oversight, they may be hampered by costly regulations. And if they adopt wage scales and working conditions that prevail in the wealthiest democracies, they may drive jobs to countries with less stringent standards. Such dilemmas call for clear, hard thinking. To aid in that undertaking, Roger Martin introduces the virtue matrix--a tool to help executives analyze corporate responsibility by viewing it as a product or service. The author uses real-life examples to explore the forms and degrees of corporate virtue. He cites Aaron Feuerstein, CEO of Malden Mills, a textile company whose plant was destroyed by fire in 1995. Rather than move operations to a lower-wage region, Feuerstein continued to pay his idled workforce and rebuilt the plant. Unlike the typical CEO of a publicly held corporation, who is accountable to hundreds or thousands of shareholders, Feuerstein was free to act so generously because he had only a few family members to answer to. But as Martin points out, corporations don't operate in a universe composed solely of shareholders. They can be subject to pressure from citizens, employees, and political authorities. The virtue matrix provides a way to assess these forces and how they interact. Martin uses it to examine why the public clamor for more responsible corporate conduct never seems to abate. Another issue the author confronts is anxiety over globalization. Finally, Martin applies the virtue matrix to two crucial questions: What are the barriers to increasing the supply of corporate virtue? And what can companies do to remove those barriers?
如果他们采取竞争对手未采用的代价高昂的举措,就有削弱公司竞争地位的风险。如果他们招致政府监管,可能会受到成本高昂的法规的束缚。而如果他们采用最富裕民主国家普遍实行的工资标准和工作条件,可能会将工作机会推向标准不那么严格的国家。此类困境需要清晰、深入的思考。为助力这项工作,罗杰·马丁引入了美德矩阵——一种帮助高管将企业责任视为一种产品或服务来分析的工具。作者运用现实生活中的例子来探讨企业美德的形式和程度。他列举了马尔登米尔斯公司(Malden Mills)的首席执行官亚伦·费尔斯廷(Aaron Feuerstein),这家纺织公司的工厂在1995年被大火烧毁。费尔斯廷没有将业务转移到低工资地区,而是继续支付闲置员工的工资并重建了工厂。不像上市公司的典型首席执行官要对数百或数千名股东负责,费尔斯廷能够如此慷慨行事是因为他只需对少数家庭成员负责。但正如马丁所指出的,企业并非只在由股东构成的世界中运营。它们可能会受到公民、员工和政治当局的压力。美德矩阵提供了一种评估这些力量及其相互作用方式的方法。马丁用它来审视为何公众对更具责任感的企业行为的呼声似乎从未减弱。作者面临的另一个问题是对全球化的焦虑。最后,马丁将美德矩阵应用于两个关键问题:增加企业美德供应的障碍有哪些?公司可以采取什么措施消除这些障碍?