Schein Edgar H
Harv Bus Rev. 2002 Mar;80(3):100-6, 134.
Despite all the time, money, and energy that executives pour into corporate change programs, the stark reality is that few companies ever succeed in genuinely reinventing themselves. That's because the people at those companies rarely master the art of transformational learning--that is, eagerly challenging deeply held assumptions about a company's processes and, in response, altering their thoughts and actions. Instead, most people just end up doing the same old things in superficially tweaked ways. Why is transformational learning so hard to achieve? HBR senior editor Diane Coutu explores this question with psychologist and MIT professor Edgar Schein, a world-renowned expert on organizational development. In sharp contrast to the optimistic rhetoric that permeates the debate on corporate learning and change, Schein is cautious about what companies can and cannot accomplish. Corporate culture can change, he says, but this kind of learning takes time, and it isn't fun. Learning is a coercive process, Schein argues, that requires blood, sweat, tears, and a certain level of anxiety to achieve the desired effect. In this article, he describes two basic types of anxiety--learning anxiety and survival anxiety--that drive radical relearning in organizations. Schein's theories spring from his early research on how American prisoners of war in Korea had been brainwashed by their captors. He cites the parallels between the "coercive persuasion" tactics the Chinese communists used to control their prisoners (isolating powerful ones and overseeing all communications) and the corporate boot camps that American companies use to indoctrinate their managers. Indeed, heavy socialization is back in style in U.S. corporations today, Schein says, even if no one is calling it that.
尽管高管们在企业变革项目上投入了大量的时间、金钱和精力,但严峻的现实是,很少有公司能真正成功地重塑自我。这是因为这些公司的员工很少掌握变革性学习的艺术——也就是说,热切地挑战对公司流程的根深蒂固的假设,并相应地改变自己的思维和行动。相反,大多数人最终只是以表面上微调的方式做着同样的老事情。为什么变革性学习如此难以实现?《哈佛商业评论》高级编辑黛安·库图与组织发展领域的世界知名专家、麻省理工学院教授埃德加·沙因探讨了这个问题。与弥漫在企业学习与变革辩论中的乐观言辞形成鲜明对比的是,沙因对公司能够做到和无法做到的事情持谨慎态度。他说,企业文化可以改变,但这种学习需要时间,而且并不有趣。沙因认为,学习是一个强制性的过程,需要付出鲜血、汗水和泪水,以及一定程度的焦虑才能达到预期效果。在本文中,他描述了推动组织进行彻底重新学习的两种基本焦虑类型——学习焦虑和生存焦虑。沙因的理论源于他早期对朝鲜战争中美国战俘如何被俘虏者洗脑的研究。他指出,中国共产党人用来控制战俘的“强制说服”策略(孤立有影响力的人并监控所有通信)与美国公司用来向经理灌输思想的企业训练营之间存在相似之处。沙因说,事实上,如今美国企业中强化社会化又流行起来了,即使没有人这样称呼它。