• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[血管外科患者与患者权利立法]

[Vascular surgical patients and patient rights legislation].

作者信息

Hanoa Rolf

机构信息

Avdeling for hjerte-, lunge- og karkirurgi Universitetssykehuset i Nord-Norge 9038 Tromsø.

出版信息

Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2002 Jan 30;122(3):290-2.

PMID:11894599
Abstract

BACKGROUND

From 1 January 2001, a new Patients Rights' Act came into force in Norway that regulates many aspects of clinical work, including patients' right to be adequately informed, the right to a second opinion, the right to choose hospital, the right to refuse a blood transfusion, and the terminally ill patient's right to refuse further treatment. This study aims at assessing the impact of the new legislation on given cases in vascular surgery and to clarify in what ways work procedures in a vascular surgical department should be changed in view of the new rules.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Ten cases drawn from our department between autumn 2000 and January 2001 were analysed in relation to the new legislation, each case representing a specific medico-legal issue regulated by the new act.

RESULT

By and large, established practice in our department is in line with the new legislation. However, better documentation is required, as well as more emphasis on integrity in relation to competing hospitals.

INTERPRETATION

Surgeons should be well informed on regulations directly affecting the practice of surgery.

摘要

背景

从2001年1月1日起,挪威一项新的《患者权利法案》生效,该法案对临床工作的许多方面进行了规范,包括患者获得充分信息的权利、获得第二诊疗意见的权利、选择医院的权利、拒绝输血的权利以及晚期患者拒绝进一步治疗的权利。本研究旨在评估新立法对血管外科特定病例的影响,并阐明鉴于新规则,血管外科部门的工作程序应在哪些方面做出改变。

材料与方法

对2000年秋季至2001年1月期间从我们科室选取的10个病例进行了与新立法相关的分析,每个病例代表新法案规定的一个特定的医疗法律问题。

结果

总体而言,我们科室的既定做法符合新立法。然而,需要更好的记录,以及更加强调与竞争医院相关的诚信问题。

解读

外科医生应充分了解直接影响手术实践的法规。

相似文献

1
[Vascular surgical patients and patient rights legislation].[血管外科患者与患者权利立法]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2002 Jan 30;122(3):290-2.
2
[The origin of informed consent].[知情同意的起源]
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2005 Oct;25(5):312-27.
3
[Wrong about the right to refuse treatment].[对拒绝治疗权的错误认知]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2005 Aug 11;125(15):2054; author reply 2054.
4
[Consent of Jehovah's Witnesses to treatment with blood preparations: legal and ethical aspects].[耶和华见证人对血液制品治疗的同意:法律和伦理方面]
Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol. 2007 Jan-Mar;57(1):138-43.
5
[Patient autonomy and informed consent in clinical practice].[临床实践中的患者自主权与知情同意]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2007 Jun 14;127(12):1644-7.
6
[Clinical appropriateness and informed consent in the Italian hospitals. Juridical problems and safeguard of patient's and physician's rights].[意大利医院中的临床适宜性与知情同意。法律问题以及患者和医生权利的保障]
Recenti Prog Med. 2011 Jul-Aug;102(7-8):296-301. doi: 10.1701/913.10049.
7
[Medical treatment without patient's consent and against her will].
Harefuah. 2014 Mar-Apr;153(3-4):139-41, 241.
8
Treating competent patients by force: the limits and lessons of Israel's Patient's Rights Act.强制治疗有行为能力的患者:以色列《患者权利法》的局限与教训
J Med Ethics. 2005 Jan;31(1):29-34. doi: 10.1136/jme.2002.000877.
9
Can cesarean section be performed without the woman's consent?
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2005 Jan;84(1):39-42. doi: 10.1111/j.0001-6349.2005.00613.x.
10
Informed consent for people with diminished capacity to consent.为同意能力减弱的人提供知情同意。
N Z Dent J. 2001 Dec;97(430):137-9.