Crandall Christian S, Eshleman Amy, O'Brien Laurie
Department of Psychology, University of Kansas, Lawrence 66045, USA.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2002 Mar;82(3):359-78.
The authors studied social norms and prejudice using M. Sherif and C. W. Sherif's (1953) group norm theory of attitudes. In 7 studies (N = 1,504), social norms were measured and manipulated to examine their effects on prejudice; both normatively proscribed and normatively prescribed forms of prejudice were included. The public expression of prejudice toward 105 social groups was very highly correlated with social approval of that expression. Participants closely adhere to social norms when expressing prejudice, evaluating scenarios of discrimination, and reacting to hostile jokes. The authors reconceptualized the source of motivation to suppress prejudice in terms of identifying with new reference groups and adapting oneself to fit new norms. Suppression scales seem to measure patterns of concern about group norms rather than personal commitments to reducing prejudice; high suppressors are strong norm followers. Compared with low suppressors, high suppressors follow normative rules more closely and are more strongly influenced by shifts in local social norms. There is much value in continuing the study of normative influence and self-adaptation to social norms, particularly in terms of the group norm theory of attitudes.
作者运用M. 谢里夫和C. W. 谢里夫(1953年)的态度群体规范理论研究社会规范和偏见。在7项研究(N = 1504)中,对社会规范进行了测量和操纵,以检验其对偏见的影响;研究涵盖了规范性禁止和规范性规定的偏见形式。对105个社会群体的偏见公开表达与对该表达的社会认可高度相关。参与者在表达偏见、评估歧视情景以及对敌意笑话做出反应时,会严格遵守社会规范。作者从认同新的参照群体并使自己适应新规范的角度,重新界定了抑制偏见的动机来源。抑制量表似乎衡量的是对群体规范的关注模式,而非个人减少偏见的承诺;高抑制者是严格的规范遵循者。与低抑制者相比,高抑制者更严格地遵循规范规则,并且更容易受到当地社会规范变化的强烈影响。继续研究规范性影响以及对社会规范的自我适应,尤其是从态度的群体规范理论角度来看,具有很大的价值。