Krahenbuhl Melinda P, Slaughter David M, Wilde Justin L, Bess John D, Miller Scott C, Khokhryakov Valentin F, Suslova Klara G, Vostrotin Vadim V, Romanov Sergey A, Menshikh Zoya S, Kudryavtseva Tamara I
Center for Excellence in Nuclear Technology, Engineering, and Research, University of Utah, Salt Lake City 84054, USA.
Health Phys. 2002 Apr;82(4):445-54. doi: 10.1097/00004032-200204000-00003.
One of the objectives of the Joint Coordinating Committee for Radiation Effects Research Project 2.4 is to document the methodology used to determine the radiation doses in workers from the Mayak Production Association who were exposed to plutonium. The doses have been employed in numerous dose response studies measuring both stochastic and deterministic effects. This article documents both the historical (pre-1999) and current ("Doses 1999") methods used by the FIB-1 scientists to determine the doses. Both methods are based on a three-chamber lung model developed by the FIB-1 scientists. This method was developed in partial isolation from the West and has unique characteristics from the more familiar ICRP biokinetic models. Some of these characteristics are the use of empirically based transportability classifications and the parameter modification for chelation-therapy-enhanced excretion data. An example dose calculation is provided and compared to the dose that would be obtained if the ICRP models were used. The comparison demonstrates that the models are not interchangeable and produce different results.
辐射效应研究项目2.4联合协调委员会的目标之一,是记录用于确定马亚克生产协会接触钚的工人所受辐射剂量的方法。这些剂量已用于众多测量随机效应和确定性效应的剂量反应研究中。本文记录了FIB-1科学家用于确定剂量的历史方法(1999年之前)和当前方法(“1999年剂量”)。两种方法均基于FIB-1科学家开发的三室肺模型。该方法是在与西方部分隔离的情况下开发的,与更为人熟知的国际辐射防护委员会(ICRP)生物动力学模型相比具有独特特征。其中一些特征包括使用基于经验的可迁移性分类以及对螯合疗法增强排泄数据的参数修正。提供了一个剂量计算示例,并与使用ICRP模型时获得的剂量进行了比较。比较结果表明,这些模型不可互换,会产生不同的结果。