Romalde J L, Area E, Sánchez G, Ribao C, Torrado I, Abad X, Pintó R M, Barja J L, Bosch A
Departamento de Microbiología y Parasitología, Facultad de Biología, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Int J Food Microbiol. 2002 Mar 25;74(1-2):119-30. doi: 10.1016/s0168-1605(01)00744-9.
A study of the presence of hepatitis A virus (HAV) and enterovirus (EV) in shellfish from the northwestern coast of Spain, one of the most important mussel producers in the world, was carried out employing dot-blot hybridization and RT-PCR techniques. In addition, bacterial contamination of the samples was evaluated by Escherichia coli (EC) counts, according to the European Union (EU) standards of shellfish microbiological quality. Shellfish samples included raft-cultured and wild mussels, as well as wild clams and cockles. Bacterial counts showed that the majority of samples (40.8%) could be classified as moderately polluted following the EU standards, and therefore should undergo depuration processes. However, differences in bacterial contamination were observed between cultured mussel and wild shellfish. Thus, percentage of clean samples (<230 EC/100 g shellfish) was clearly higher in cultured mussels (49.1%) than in wild mussels (22.8%) or clams and cockles (10.7%). HAV was detected in 27.4% and EV in 43.9% of the samples that were analyzed. Simultaneous detection of both viral types occurred in 14.1% of the samples. Statistical tests of dependence (chi-square test) showed no relationship either between viral and bacterial contamination, or between the presence of HAV and EV. Comparative analysis of hybridization and RT-PCR for viral detection yielded different results depending on the virus type that was studied, RT-PCR being effective for HAV but not for EV detection. The obtained results reinforce once again the inadequacy of bacteriological standards to assess viral contamination and suggest that although virological analysis of shellfish is possible by molecular techniques, interlaboratory standardization and validation studies are needed before the routine use in monitoring shellfish microbiological safety.
采用斑点杂交和逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)技术,对来自西班牙西北海岸(世界最重要的贻贝产区之一)的贝类中的甲型肝炎病毒(HAV)和肠道病毒(EV)进行了研究。此外,根据欧盟贝类微生物质量标准,通过大肠杆菌(EC)计数评估了样本的细菌污染情况。贝类样本包括筏式养殖的贻贝和野生贻贝,以及野生蛤和鸟蛤。细菌计数显示,按照欧盟标准,大多数样本(40.8%)可归类为中度污染,因此应进行净化处理。然而,养殖贻贝和野生贝类之间的细菌污染存在差异。因此,养殖贻贝(49.1%)中清洁样本(<230 EC/100 g贝类)的比例明显高于野生贻贝(22.8%)或蛤和鸟蛤(10.7%)。在所分析的样本中,27.4%检测到HAV,43.9%检测到EV。14.1%的样本同时检测到两种病毒类型。相关性统计检验(卡方检验)表明,病毒污染与细菌污染之间,以及HAV和EV的存在之间均无关联。对病毒检测的杂交和RT-PCR进行比较分析,根据所研究的病毒类型得出了不同结果,RT-PCR对HAV检测有效,但对EV检测无效。所得结果再次证明了细菌学标准在评估病毒污染方面的不足,并表明尽管通过分子技术对贝类进行病毒学分析是可行的,但在常规用于监测贝类微生物安全性之前,需要进行实验室间的标准化和验证研究。