Kilpikoski Sinikka, Airaksinen Olavi, Kankaanpää Markku, Leminen Päivi, Videman Tapio, Alen Markku
Department of Health Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 Apr 15;27(8):E207-14. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200204150-00016.
A test-retest design was used.
To assess interexaminer reliability of the McKenzie method for performing clinical tests and classifying patients with low back pain.
Clinical methods and tests classifying patients with nonspecific low back pain have been based mainly on symptom duration or extent of pain referral. The McKenzie mechanical diagnostic and classification approach is a widely used noninvasive, low-technology method of assessing patients with low back pain. However, little is known about the interexaminer reliability of the method, previous studies having yielded conflicting results.
For this study, 39 volunteers with low back pain, mean age 40 years (range, 24-55 years), were blindly assessed by two physical therapists trained in the McKenzie method. The variability of two examiners for binary decisions was expressed by the kappa coefficient, and by the proportion of observed agreement, as calculated from a 2 x 2 contingency table of concordance.
On the basis of pure observation alone, agreement among clinical tests on the presence and direction of lateral shift was 77% (kappa = 0.2; P < 0.248) and 79% (kappa = 0.4; P < 0.003), respectively. Agreement on the relevance of lateral shift and the lateral component according to symptom responses was 85% (kappa = 0.7; P < 0.000) and 92% (kappa= 0.4; P < 0.021), respectively. Using the repeated movements and static end-range loading strategy to define the centralization phenomenon and directional preference, agreement was 95% (kappa = 0.7; P < 0.002) and 90% (kappa = 0.9; P < 0.000), respectively. When patients with low back pain were classified into the McKenzie main syndromes and into specific subgroups, agreement was 95% (kappa = 0.6; P < 0.000) and 74% (kappa = 0.7; P < 0.000), respectively.
Interexaminer reliability of the McKenzie lumbar spine assessment in performing clinical tests and classifying patients with low back pain into syndromes were good and statistically significant when the examiners had been trained in the McKenzie method.
采用重测设计。
评估麦肯齐方法在进行临床检查及对腰痛患者进行分类时检查者间的可靠性。
对非特异性腰痛患者进行分类的临床方法和检查主要基于症状持续时间或疼痛牵涉范围。麦肯齐力学诊断和分类方法是一种广泛应用的评估腰痛患者的非侵入性、低技术方法。然而,对于该方法检查者间的可靠性了解甚少,此前的研究结果相互矛盾。
在本研究中,39名平均年龄40岁(范围24 - 55岁)的腰痛志愿者由两名接受过麦肯齐方法培训的物理治疗师进行盲法评估。两位检查者二元决策的变异性通过kappa系数以及根据一致性2×2列联表计算的观察一致性比例来表示。
仅基于单纯观察,临床检查在侧方移位的存在和方向上的一致性分别为77%(kappa = 0.2;P < 0.248)和79%(kappa = 0.4;P < 0.003)。根据症状反应在侧方移位及侧方成分的相关性上的一致性分别为85%(kappa = 0.7;P < 0.000)和92%(kappa = 0.4;P < 0.021)。使用重复动作和静态终末范围负荷策略来定义向心性现象和方向偏好时,一致性分别为95%(kappa = 0.7;P < 0.002)和90%(kappa = 0.9;P < 0.000)。当将腰痛患者分类为麦肯齐主要综合征及特定亚组时,一致性分别为95%(kappa = 0.6;P < 0.000)和74%(kappa = 0.7;P < 0.000)。
当检查者接受过麦肯齐方法培训时,麦肯齐腰椎评估在进行临床检查及将腰痛患者分类为综合征方面的检查者间可靠性良好且具有统计学意义。