• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

蓖麻毒素和志贺毒素进入细胞的途径。

Pathways followed by ricin and Shiga toxin into cells.

作者信息

Sandvig Kirsten, Grimmer Stine, Lauvrak Silje Ugland, Torgersen Maria Lyngaas, Skretting Grethe, van Deurs Bo, Iversen Tore Geir

机构信息

Institute for Cancer Research, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Montebello, 0310 Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Histochem Cell Biol. 2002 Feb;117(2):131-41. doi: 10.1007/s00418-001-0346-2. Epub 2001 Nov 20.

DOI:10.1007/s00418-001-0346-2
PMID:11935289
Abstract

The plant toxin ricin and the bacterial toxin Shiga toxin belong to a group of protein toxins that inhibit protein synthesis in cells enzymatically after entry into the cytosol. Ricin and Shiga toxin, which both have an enzymatically active moiety that inactivates ribosomes and a moiety that binds to cell surface receptors, enter the cytosol after binding to the cell surface, endocytosis by different mechanisms, and retrograde transport to the Golgi apparatus and the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). The toxins can be used to investigate the various transport steps involved, both the endocytic mechanisms as well as pathways for retrograde transport to the ER. Recent studies show that not only do several endocytic mechanisms exist in the same cell, but they are not equally sensitive to removal of cholesterol. New data have revealed that there is also more than one pathway leading from endosomes to the Golgi apparatus and retrogradely from the Golgi to the ER. Trafficking of protein toxins along these pathways will be discussed in the present article.

摘要

植物毒素蓖麻毒素和细菌毒素志贺毒素属于一类蛋白质毒素,它们进入胞质溶胶后通过酶促作用抑制细胞内的蛋白质合成。蓖麻毒素和志贺毒素都有一个使核糖体失活的酶活性部分和一个与细胞表面受体结合的部分,它们在与细胞表面结合后,通过不同机制进行内吞作用,并逆行转运至高尔基体和内质网(ER)。这些毒素可用于研究所涉及的各种转运步骤,包括内吞机制以及逆行转运至内质网的途径。最近的研究表明,同一细胞中不仅存在多种内吞机制,而且它们对胆固醇去除的敏感性也不尽相同。新数据显示,从内体到高尔基体以及从高尔基体到内质网的逆行途径也不止一条。本文将讨论蛋白质毒素沿这些途径的运输情况。

相似文献

1
Pathways followed by ricin and Shiga toxin into cells.蓖麻毒素和志贺毒素进入细胞的途径。
Histochem Cell Biol. 2002 Feb;117(2):131-41. doi: 10.1007/s00418-001-0346-2. Epub 2001 Nov 20.
2
Endocytosis and retrograde transport of Shiga toxin.内吞作用和志贺毒素的逆行转运。
Toxicon. 2010 Dec 15;56(7):1181-5. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2009.11.021. Epub 2009 Nov 29.
3
Transport of protein toxins into cells: pathways used by ricin, cholera toxin and Shiga toxin.蛋白质毒素进入细胞的运输:蓖麻毒素、霍乱毒素和志贺毒素所利用的途径。
FEBS Lett. 2002 Oct 2;529(1):49-53. doi: 10.1016/s0014-5793(02)03182-4.
4
Polyunsaturated fatty acids regulate Shiga toxin transport.多不饱和脂肪酸调节志贺毒素的转运。
Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2007 Dec 14;364(2):283-8. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2007.09.126. Epub 2007 Oct 9.
5
Efficient endosome-to-Golgi transport of Shiga toxin is dependent on dynamin and clathrin.志贺毒素从内体到高尔基体的高效运输依赖于发动蛋白和网格蛋白。
J Cell Sci. 2004 May 1;117(Pt 11):2321-31. doi: 10.1242/jcs.01081.
6
Delivery into cells: lessons learned from plant and bacterial toxins.进入细胞:从植物和细菌毒素中学到的经验教训。
Gene Ther. 2005 Jun;12(11):865-72. doi: 10.1038/sj.gt.3302525.
7
Ricin transport into cells: studies of endocytosis and intracellular transport.蓖麻毒素向细胞内的转运:内吞作用和细胞内转运的研究
Int J Med Microbiol. 2000 Oct;290(4-5):415-20. doi: 10.1016/S1438-4221(00)80055-7.
8
Protein toxins from plants and bacteria: probes for intracellular transport and tools in medicine.植物和细菌中的蛋白毒素:细胞内运输的探针和医学工具。
FEBS Lett. 2010 Jun 18;584(12):2626-34. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2010.04.008. Epub 2010 Apr 10.
9
Retrograde transport of endocytosed Shiga toxin to the endoplasmic reticulum.内吞的志贺毒素向内质网的逆向转运。
Nature. 1992 Aug 6;358(6386):510-2. doi: 10.1038/358510a0.
10
Sorting nexin 8 regulates endosome-to-Golgi transport.分选连接蛋白8调节内体到高尔基体的运输。
Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2009 Dec 4;390(1):109-14. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2009.09.076. Epub 2009 Sep 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Mutational Analysis of RIP Type I Dianthin-30 Suggests a Role for Arg24 in Endocytosis.RIP 型 I 二氢杨梅素突变分析提示 Arg24 在胞吞作用中的作用。
Toxins (Basel). 2024 May 10;16(5):219. doi: 10.3390/toxins16050219.
2
Structure-Function Analysis of the A1 Subunit of Shiga Toxin 2 with Peptides That Target the P-Stalk Binding Site and Inhibit Activity.志贺毒素 2 亚单位 A1 的结构-功能分析与靶向 P 茎结合位点并抑制其活性的肽
Biochemistry. 2024 Apr 2;63(7):893-905. doi: 10.1021/acs.biochem.3c00733. Epub 2024 Mar 11.
3
Phytaspase Is Capable of Detaching the Endoplasmic Reticulum Retrieval Signal from Tobacco Calreticulin-3.
植物天冬氨酸蛋白酶能够从烟草钙网蛋白 3 上脱离内质网回收信号。
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Nov 20;24(22):16527. doi: 10.3390/ijms242216527.
4
Sapovaccarin-S1 and -S2, Two Type I RIP Isoforms from the Seeds of L.沙松毒蛋白 S1 和 S2,来自 L. 种子的两种 I 型 RIP 同工型
Toxins (Basel). 2022 Jun 30;14(7):449. doi: 10.3390/toxins14070449.
5
The Cytotoxic Necrotizing Factors (CNFs)-A Family of Rho GTPase-Activating Bacterial Exotoxins.细胞毒性坏死因子(CNFs)-一类 Rho GTPase 激活细菌外毒素。
Toxins (Basel). 2021 Dec 15;13(12):901. doi: 10.3390/toxins13120901.
6
Editorial: Interaction of Pathogenic With the Host: Pathogenomics, Virulence and Antibiotic Resistance.社论:病原体与宿主的相互作用:病原体基因组学、毒力和抗生素耐药性。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021 Mar 31;11:654283. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.654283. eCollection 2021.
7
Molecular Detection of Antibiotic Resistance Genes in Shiga Toxin-Producing Isolated from Different Sources.从不同来源分离的产志贺毒素菌中抗生素抗性基因的分子检测
Antibiotics (Basel). 2021 Mar 24;10(4):344. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10040344.
8
Prevalence and virulence gene profiles of Escherichia coli O157 from cattle slaughtered in Buea, Cameroon.喀麦隆布埃亚屠宰牛源大肠杆菌 O157 的流行情况及毒力基因谱。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 15;15(12):e0235583. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235583. eCollection 2020.
9
Quantitative Methods to Study Endocytosis and Retrograde Transport of Cargo Proteins.定量研究货物蛋白胞吞作用和逆行转运的方法。
Methods Mol Biol. 2021;2233:53-70. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1044-2_4.
10
Molecular Biology of Shiga Toxins' Effects on Mammalian Cells.志贺毒素对哺乳动物细胞影响的分子生物学
Toxins (Basel). 2020 May 23;12(5):345. doi: 10.3390/toxins12050345.