Aali Bibi Shahnaz, Nejad Samira Shahabi
Kerman Medical University, Niknafs Maternity Center, PO Box 76135-783, Kerman, Iran.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2002 Jan;81(1):25-30. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0412.2002.810105.x.
Pre-eclampsia is one of the most serious and common complications of pregnancy. Nifedipine, a calcium channel blocker, and the vasodilator hydralazine have both been used as antihypertensive agents in this condition. The aim of this study was to determine which of these two agents is the most appropriate antihypertensive in the management of severe pre-eclampsia.
One hundred and twenty-six pre-eclamptic patients with a gestational age of more than 20 weeks were randomized to receive either 8 mg nifedipine sublingually or 5-10 mg intravenous hydralazine. Women with a history of heart failure and women receiving antihypertensive treatment during the course of the current pregnancy were excluded. For each patient the following data were recorded; the number of drug administrations, the time needed to control blood pressure, mean urinary output, the time interval between effective control and a new hypertensive crisis after each drug administration and relevant adverse effects in mother or fetus.
Effective control of blood pressure was achieved in both treatment arms. Data analysis indicated significantly fewer drug administrations in the nifedipine arm of the study. The time interval before a new hypertensive crisis following initial effective control of blood pressure was significantly longer in the nifedipine group when compared with hydralazine. Effective control of blood pressure was achieved more rapidly in multiparous patients receiving nifedipine (p=0.026). Mean urinary output before and after delivery was greater in the nifedipine arm of the study. There were no significant differences between the two groups in other variables. In addition, in neither group were there any serious adverse effects in mother or fetus.
Nifedipine is safe and more effective than hydralazine in controlling blood pressure in severe pre-eclampsia. It has the added advantage of being cheaper and more widely available than the latter and is easily administered.
子痫前期是妊娠最严重且常见的并发症之一。硝苯地平,一种钙通道阻滞剂,以及血管扩张剂肼屈嗪都曾在这种情况下用作抗高血压药物。本研究的目的是确定这两种药物中哪一种是治疗重度子痫前期最合适的抗高血压药物。
126例孕龄超过20周的子痫前期患者被随机分为两组,分别舌下含服8毫克硝苯地平或静脉注射5 - 10毫克肼屈嗪。排除有心力衰竭病史的女性以及在本次妊娠期间接受抗高血压治疗的女性。记录每位患者的以下数据:药物给药次数、控制血压所需时间、平均尿量、每次给药后有效控制血压至新的高血压危象的时间间隔以及母亲或胎儿的相关不良反应。
两个治疗组均实现了血压的有效控制。数据分析表明,研究中硝苯地平组的药物给药次数明显较少。与肼屈嗪相比,硝苯地平组在首次有效控制血压后至新的高血压危象的时间间隔明显更长。接受硝苯地平治疗的经产妇能更快实现血压的有效控制(p = 0.026)。研究中硝苯地平组分娩前后的平均尿量更大。两组在其他变量方面无显著差异。此外,两组均未出现母亲或胎儿的严重不良反应。
在控制重度子痫前期的血压方面,硝苯地平比肼屈嗪更安全、更有效。它还具有比后者更便宜、更易获得且易于给药的额外优势。