• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Impact of reference-based pricing for angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors on drug utilization.基于参考定价的血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂对药物利用的影响。
CMAJ. 2002 Mar 19;166(6):737-45.
2
Outcomes of reference pricing for angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors.血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂参考定价的结果
N Engl J Med. 2002 Mar 14;346(11):822-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa003087.
3
Clinical and economic consequences of reference pricing for dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers.二氢吡啶类钙通道阻滞剂参考定价的临床和经济后果。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2003 Oct;74(4):388-400. doi: 10.1016/S0009-9236(03)00227-3.
4
Net health plan savings from reference pricing for angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in elderly British Columbia residents.不列颠哥伦比亚省老年居民使用血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂的参考定价所带来的医保计划净节省费用。
Med Care. 2004 Jul;42(7):653-60. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000129497.10930.a2.
5
Reference-based pricing of prescription drugs: exploring the equivalence of angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors.处方药的参考定价:探索血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂的等效性。
CMAJ. 1999 Aug 10;161(3):255-60.
6
Physician gender and changes in drug prescribing after the implementation of reference pricing in British Columbia.不列颠哥伦比亚省实施参考定价后医生性别与药物处方的变化
Clin Ther. 2003 Jan;25(1):273-84. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(03)90037-3.
7
Why is calling an ACE an ACE so controversial? Evaluating reference-based pricing in British Columbia.为什么将“参考价格医保计划”称为“参考价格医保计划”如此具有争议性?对不列颠哥伦比亚省基于参考定价的医保计划进行评估。
CMAJ. 2002 Mar 19;166(6):763-4.
8
Impact of reference-based pricing of nitrates on the use and costs of anti-anginal drugs.硝酸盐类药物基于参考定价对抗心绞痛药物使用及成本的影响。
CMAJ. 2001 Oct 16;165(8):1011-9.
9
Prescription duration after drug copay changes in older people: methodological aspects.老年人药物共付变化后的处方持续时间:方法学方面
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2002 Mar;50(3):521-5. doi: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2002.50120.x.
10
Impact of reference-based pricing for histamine-2 receptor antagonists and restricted access for proton pump inhibitors in British Columbia.基于参考定价对组胺-2受体拮抗剂的影响以及不列颠哥伦比亚省质子泵抑制剂的受限获取情况。
CMAJ. 2002 Jun 25;166(13):1655-62.

引用本文的文献

1
Can income-based co-payment rates improve disparity? The case of the choice between brand-name and generic drugs.基于收入的共付率能否改善差距?品牌药和仿制药选择的案例。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Nov 1;19(1):780. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4598-8.
2
Pharmaceutical policies: effects of reference pricing, other pricing, and purchasing policies.药品政策:参考定价、其他定价及采购政策的影响
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Oct 16;2014(10):CD005979. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005979.pub2.
3
Potential bias in medication adherence studies of prevalent users.现患使用者药物依从性研究中的潜在偏倚。
Health Serv Res. 2013 Aug;48(4):1468-86. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12043. Epub 2013 Feb 13.
4
Potential savings of harmonising hospital and community formularies for chronic disease medications initiated in hospital.优化医院和社区慢性病药物处方集,以节省潜在费用。
PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e39737. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0039737. Epub 2012 Jun 26.
5
Patient socioeconomic determinants of the choice of generic versus brand name drugs in the context of a reference price system: evidence from Belgian prescription data.参考定价制度下患者社会经济决定因素对选择仿制药与品牌药的影响:来自比利时处方数据的证据。
Eur J Health Econ. 2012 Jun;13(3):301-13. doi: 10.1007/s10198-012-0377-8. Epub 2012 Mar 18.
6
Patient socioeconomic determinants for the choice of the cheapest molecule within a cluster: evidence from Belgian prescription data.患者社会经济决定因素对集群内最便宜分子的选择:来自比利时处方数据的证据。
Eur J Health Econ. 2012 Jun;13(3):315-25. doi: 10.1007/s10198-011-0367-2. Epub 2011 Dec 3.
7
Changes in drug utilization during a gap in insurance coverage: an examination of the medicare Part D coverage gap.保险覆盖中断期间药物利用的变化:对医疗保险部分 D 覆盖缺口的考察。
PLoS Med. 2011 Aug;8(8):e1001075. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001075. Epub 2011 Aug 16.
8
Comparison of tiered formularies and reference pricing policies: a systematic review.分层处方集与参考定价政策的比较:一项系统综述。
Open Med. 2009;3(3):e131-9. Epub 2009 Aug 4.
9
Effects of reference pricing in pharmaceutical markets: a review.药品市场参考定价的影响:综述
Pharmacoeconomics. 2011 Jan;29(1):17-33. doi: 10.2165/11537860-000000000-00000.
10
Impact of drug cost sharing on service use and adverse clinical outcomes in elderly receiving antidepressants.药物费用分担对接受抗抑郁药治疗的老年人服务利用及不良临床结局的影响。
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2010 Mar;13(1):37-44.

本文引用的文献

1
Adverse events associated with prescription drug cost-sharing among poor and elderly persons.贫困和老年人群中与处方药费用分担相关的不良事件。
JAMA. 2001;285(4):421-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.285.4.421.
2
On the evaluation of drug benefits policy changes with longitudinal claims data: the policy maker's versus the clinician's perspective.
Health Policy. 2001 Feb;55(2):97-109. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8510(00)00120-2.
3
The Medicare prescription drug benefit: how will the game be played?医疗保险处方药福利:这场博弈将如何展开?
Health Aff (Millwood). 2000 Mar-Apr;19(2):8-23. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.19.2.8.
4
1999 Canadian recommendations for the management of hypertension. Task Force for the Development of the 1999 Canadian Recommendations for the Management of Hypertension.1999年加拿大高血压管理指南。1999年加拿大高血压管理指南制定工作组。
CMAJ. 1999;161 Suppl 12(12):S1-17.
5
Reference-based pricing of prescription drugs: exploring the equivalence of angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors.处方药的参考定价:探索血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂的等效性。
CMAJ. 1999 Aug 10;161(3):255-60.
6
Thrombotic vascular events after change of statin.他汀类药物更换后的血栓性血管事件。
Lancet. 1999 Mar 6;353(9155):844. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)76508-9.
7
What is Germany's experience on reference based drug pricing and the etiology of adverse health outcomes or substitution?德国在基于参考的药品定价以及不良健康结果或替代的病因方面有哪些经验?
Health Policy. 1998 Jun;44(3):253-60. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8510(98)00023-2.
8
Pharmaceutical cost containment and innovation in the United States.美国的药品成本控制与创新
Health Policy. 1997 Sep;41 Suppl:S71-89. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8510(97)00048-1.
9
Agreement between physicians' office records and Medicare Part B claims data.医生办公室记录与医疗保险B部分索赔数据之间的一致性。
Health Care Financ Rev. 1995 Summer;16(4):189-99.
10
Agreement between drug treatment data and a discharge diagnosis of diabetes mellitus in the elderly.
Am J Epidemiol. 1999 Mar 15;149(6):541-9. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009850.

基于参考定价的血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂对药物利用的影响。

Impact of reference-based pricing for angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors on drug utilization.

作者信息

Schneeweiss Sebastian, Soumerai Stephen B, Glynn Robert J, Maclure Malcolm, Dormuth Colin, Walker Alexander M

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Mass., USA.

出版信息

CMAJ. 2002 Mar 19;166(6):737-45.

PMID:11944760
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC99452/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Increasing copayments for higher-priced prescription medications has been suggested as a means to help finance drug coverage for elderly patients, but evaluations of the impact of such policies are rare. The objective of this study was to analyze the effect of reference-based pricing of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors on drug utilization, cost savings and potential substitution with other medication classes.

METHODS

We analyzed 36 months of claims data from British Columbia for 2 years before and 1 year after implementation of reference-based pricing (in January 1997). The 119,074 patients were community-living Pharmacare beneficiaries 65 years of age or older who used ACE inhibitors during the study period. The main outcomes were changes over time in use of ACE inhibitors, use of antihypertensive drugs and expenditures for antihypertensive drugs, as well as predictors of medication switching related to reference-based pricing.

RESULTS

We observed a sharp decline (29%) in the use of higher-priced cost-shared ACE inhibitors immediately after implementation of the policy (p < 0.001). After a transition period, the post-implementation utilization rate for all ACE inhibitors was 11% lower than projected from pre-implementation data. However, overall utilization of antihypertensives was unchanged (p = 0.40). The policy saved $6.7 million in pharmaceutical expenditures during its first 12 months. Patients with heart failure or diabetes mellitus who were taking a cost-shared ACE inhibitor were more likely to remain on the same medication after implementation of reference-based pricing (OR 1.12 [95% confidence interval, CI, 1.06-1.19] and 1.28 [95% CI 1.20-1.36] respectively). Patients with low-income status were more likely than those with high-income status to stop all antihypertensive therapy (OR 1.65 [95% CI 1.43-1.89]), which reflects a general trend toward discontinuation of therapy among these patients even before implementation of reference-based pricing.

INTERPRETATION

Reference-based pricing in British Columbia achieved a sustained reduction in drug expenditures, and no changes in overall use of antihypertensive therapy were observed. Further research is needed on the overall health and economic effects of such policies.

摘要

背景

提高高价处方药的自付费用被认为是帮助为老年患者的药物保险提供资金的一种方式,但对此类政策影响的评估却很少见。本研究的目的是分析基于参考定价的血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)抑制剂对药物使用、成本节约以及与其他药物类别潜在替代的影响。

方法

我们分析了不列颠哥伦比亚省在基于参考定价实施前2年和实施后1年(1997年1月)的36个月索赔数据。这119,074名患者是65岁及以上的社区居住药物保险受益人,他们在研究期间使用了ACE抑制剂主要结果是ACE抑制剂使用、抗高血压药物使用和抗高血压药物支出随时间的变化,以及与基于参考定价相关的药物转换预测因素。

结果

我们观察到政策实施后,高价成本分摊ACE抑制剂的使用立即大幅下降(29%)(p<0.001)。经过一个过渡期后,所有ACE抑制剂实施后的利用率比实施前数据预测的低11%。然而,抗高血压药物的总体使用情况没有变化(p=0.40)该政策在其实施的前12个月节省了670万美元的药品支出。在实施基于参考定价后,正在服用成本分摊ACE抑制剂的心力衰竭或糖尿病患者更有可能继续使用同一种药物(分别为OR 1.12[95%置信区间,CI,1.06 - 1.19]和1.28[95%CI 1.20 - 1.36])。低收入患者比高收入患者更有可能停止所有抗高血压治疗(OR 1.65[95%CI 1.43 - 1.89]),这反映了即使在实施基于参考定价之前,这些患者中就存在的停药总体趋势。

解读

不列颠哥伦比亚省的基于参考定价实现了药品支出的持续减少,并且未观察到抗高血压治疗总体使用情况的变化。需要对这类政策的整体健康和经济影响进行进一步研究。