Zhang Bing, Nakama Hidenori, Fattah A S M Abdul, Kamijo Noboru
Department of Public Health, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Asahi 3-1-1, Matsumoto, 390-8621, Japan.
Hepatogastroenterology. 2002 Jan-Feb;49(43):165-7.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of an immunochemical fecal occult-blood test for colorectal cancer between the stool specimens obtained during the routine screening and those during the digital rectal examination.
One hundred and fourteen patients with colorectal cancer and 228 healthy controls served as subjects of the study. Fecal occult-blood was tested by both of two methods; by the routine screening and by the digital rectal examination, and the sensitivity and specificity of an immunochemical fecal occult-blood test were determined in these two methods.
The sensitivity and specificity were 79.8% and 96.5% in the routine screening method, and 86.0% and 79.8% in the digital rectal examination method, respectively, showing a significant difference in the specificity (P < 0.01) between these two stool collection methods. There was no significant difference in the sensitivity between these two stool collection methods.
These findings indicate that the stool specimens collected at the time of the digital rectal examination is not suitable for testing of fecal occult-blood.
背景/目的:比较在常规筛查和直肠指检期间获取的粪便标本中,免疫化学粪便潜血试验对结直肠癌的诊断准确性。
114例结直肠癌患者和228例健康对照作为研究对象。采用两种方法检测粪便潜血;通过常规筛查和直肠指检,并在这两种方法中确定免疫化学粪便潜血试验的敏感性和特异性。
常规筛查方法的敏感性和特异性分别为79.8%和96.5%,直肠指检方法的敏感性和特异性分别为86.0%和79.8%,这两种粪便采集方法在特异性方面存在显著差异(P < 0.01)。这两种粪便采集方法在敏感性方面无显著差异。
这些发现表明,直肠指检时采集的粪便标本不适合用于粪便潜血检测。