Santtila Pekka, Sandnabba N Kenneth, Alison Laurence, Nordling Niklas
Department of Psychology, Abo Akademi University, FIN-20500, Finland.
Arch Sex Behav. 2002 Apr;31(2):185-96. doi: 10.1023/a:1014791220495.
This study explores the extent to which 29 individual sexual behaviors, previously identified in L. Alison, P. Santtila, N. K. Sandnabba, and N. Nordling (2001), as each being associated with 1 of 4 different broad themes of sadomasochistically oriented behavior, represent different scales of intensity within each theme. The themes were as follows: hypermasculinity, administration and receipt of pain, physical restriction, and humiliation. For example, we wanted to establish whether skinbranding is a more intense expression of pain than spanking; whether faceslapping is a more intense expression of humilitation than flagellation, and so on. One hundred and eighty-four participants (22 women and 162 men) who were members of two sadomasochistically oriented clubs gave information concerning which of the 29 sexual behaviors they had participated in during the preceding 12 months. A multivariate analysis (POSAC; Shye, 1994) supported the existence of cumulative scales in each of the 4 themes, suggesting that the order in which people engage in different sadomasochistic behaviors is not random and that specific, less intense behaviors generally precede more intense behaviors.
本研究探讨了29种个体性行为在何种程度上代表了每个主题内不同的强度等级。这29种性行为先前由L. 艾莉森、P. 桑蒂拉、N. K. 桑德纳巴和N. 诺德林（2001年）确定，每种行为都与受虐癖导向行为的4个不同宽泛主题之一相关联。这些主题如下：过度男性化、施加和接受疼痛、身体限制以及羞辱。例如，我们想确定烙印是否比打屁股是更强烈的疼痛表达；打脸是否比鞭打是更强烈的羞辱表达，等等。184名参与者（22名女性和162名男性）是两个受虐癖导向俱乐部的成员，他们提供了在前12个月内参与过的29种性行为中的哪些行为的信息。一项多变量分析（POSAC；施耶，1994年）支持了4个主题中每个主题都存在累积量表，这表明人们进行不同受虐癖行为的顺序并非随机，并且特定的、强度较小的行为通常先于强度较大的行为。
