Foltynie Thomas, Brayne Carol, Barker Roger A
Cambridge Centre for Brain Repair, University of Cambridge, UK.
J Neurol. 2002 Feb;249(2):138-45. doi: 10.1007/pl00007856.
The diagnosis of Idiopathic Parkinson's disease (IPD) requires post mortem neuropathological confirmation to be secure, since there is marked heterogeneity in the clinical phenotype of these patients. Pathologically confirmed IPD encompasses a spectrum of microscopic appearances with respect to the extent and distribution of Lewy Body deposition, which may reflect the clinical phenotypes observed during life. In this review, we discuss how IPD is currently defined and the purpose and applications of a classification of the disease. We have also performed a systematic review of the literature to present the quantitative evidence on which potential classifications of the disease might be based. This evidence suggests that sub-groups based on age of onset, motor presentation, or subsequent motor phenotype may have some use in predicting disease progression. However, further clinicopathological studies are required to evaluate pathological heterogeneity within these groups. Clinical sub-groups may be related to a variety of as yet unknown risks, including genetic factors for both the familial and sporadic forms of the disease, and may have far reaching consequences for our understanding of disease pathogenesis and treatment strategies.
特发性帕金森病(IPD)的诊断需要尸检神经病理学确认才能确定,因为这些患者的临床表型存在显著异质性。病理确诊的IPD在路易小体沉积的程度和分布方面包含一系列微观表现,这可能反映了生前观察到的临床表型。在本综述中,我们讨论了IPD目前是如何定义的,以及该疾病分类的目的和应用。我们还对文献进行了系统综述,以呈现可能作为该疾病潜在分类依据的定量证据。该证据表明,基于发病年龄、运动表现或后续运动表型的亚组在预测疾病进展方面可能有一定作用。然而,需要进一步的临床病理学研究来评估这些组内的病理异质性。临床亚组可能与多种尚不清楚的风险有关,包括该疾病家族性和散发性形式的遗传因素,并且可能对我们理解疾病发病机制和治疗策略产生深远影响。