Sung Seung Mo, Kim Jong Heun, Yang Eunjoo, Abrams Kelley Yost, Lyoo In Kyoon
Department of Psychiatry, Seoul National University College of Medicine and the Neuroscience Research Institute, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, South Korea.
Compr Psychiatry. 2002 May-Jun;43(3):235-43. doi: 10.1053/comp.2002.30794.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Korean version of the Temperament and Character Inventory (TCI), a self-report questionnaire based on Cloninger's biosocial model of personality. The TCI was translated into Korean and administered to 851 Korean college students. A test-retest study of the TCI was conducted across a 3-month interval with 130 subjects. Internal consistency was calculated by Cronbach alpha. Test-retest reliability was analyzed by Pearson correlation analysis. Factor analyses for the temperament and character dimensions were performed using principal component analysis, rotating factors obliquely by promax. A comparison of TCI scores between Korean and United States college students was done using independent t tests. Cronbach alpha values for the TCI scales ranged from.60 to.85 for the temperament scales and from.82 to.87 for the character scales. Test-retest correlations (r) ranged from.52 to.72 for the temperament scales and from.52 to.71 for the character scales. Principal component factor analyses showed similar factor structures of four temperaments and three characters as the American version of the TCI, except for the Reward Dependence and Persistence temperament scales. Explorative factor analysis with a condition of eigenvalue greater than 1 produced five factors, as compared to seven factors extracted in Cloninger's original report. Results using a preset seven-factor solution was forced and did not successfully extract Cloninger's seven factors. Korean college students had higher mean scores on Harm Avoidance and lower mean scores on the rest of the scales as compared to a sample of US college students. The results of this study confirm that the Korean TCI has satisfactory psychometric properties and reflects Cloninger's biosocial model of personality.
本研究旨在评估基于克隆宁格人格生物社会模型的自我报告问卷——《气质与性格量表》(TCI)韩文版的信度和效度。TCI被翻译成韩文,并施测于851名韩国大学生。对130名受试者进行了为期3个月的TCI重测研究。通过克朗巴哈α系数计算内部一致性。通过皮尔逊相关分析来分析重测信度。使用主成分分析对气质和性格维度进行因子分析,并采用斜交旋转法(promax)旋转因子。使用独立样本t检验对韩国和美国大学生的TCI得分进行比较。TCI各量表的克朗巴哈α系数,气质量表范围为0.60至0.85,性格量表范围为0.82至0.87。气质量表的重测相关系数(r)范围为0.52至0.72,性格量表的重测相关系数范围为0.52至0.71。主成分因子分析表明,除了奖励依赖和坚持性气质量表外,四种气质和三种性格的因子结构与美国版TCI相似。特征值大于1条件下的探索性因子分析产生了五个因子,而克隆宁格的原始报告中提取了七个因子。使用预设的七因子解法进行强制分析,未能成功提取克隆宁格的七个因子。与美国大学生样本相比,韩国大学生在回避伤害量表上的平均得分较高,但在其他量表上的平均得分较低。本研究结果证实,韩文版TCI具有令人满意的心理测量学特性,并反映了克隆宁格的人格生物社会模型。