• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

数字化乳腺X线摄影解读:软拷贝与胶片打印显示的速度及准确性比较

Interpretation of digital mammograms: comparison of speed and accuracy of soft-copy versus printed-film display.

作者信息

Pisano Etta D, Cole Elodia B, Kistner Emily O, Muller Keith E, Hemminger Bradley M, Brown Mary L, Johnston R Eugene, Kuzmiak Cherie M, Braeuning M Patricia, Freimanis Rita I, Soo Mary Scott, Baker J A, Walsh Ruth

机构信息

Dept of Radiology, Univ of North Carolina School of Med, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7510, USA.

出版信息

Radiology. 2002 May;223(2):483-8. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2232010704.

DOI:10.1148/radiol.2232010704
PMID:11997557
Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the speed and accuracy of the interpretations of digital mammograms by radiologists by using printed-film versus soft-copy display.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

After being trained in interpretation of digital mammograms, eight radiologists interpreted 63 digital mammograms, all with old studies for comparison. All studies were interpreted by all readers in soft-copy and printed-film display, with interpretations of images in the same cases at least 1 month apart. Mammograms were interpreted in cases that included six biopsy-proved cancers and 20 biopsy-proved benign lesions, 20 cases of probably benign findings in patients who underwent 6-month follow-up, and 17 cases without apparent findings. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (A(z)), sensitivity, and specificity were calculated for soft-copy and printed-film display.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in the speed of interpretation, but interpretations with soft-copy display were slightly faster. The differences in A(z), sensitivity, and specificity were not significantly different; A(z) and sensitivity were slightly better for interpretations with printed film, and specificity was slightly better for interpretations with soft copy.

CONCLUSION

Interpretation with soft-copy display is likely to be useful with digital mammography and is unlikely to significantly change accuracy or speed.

摘要

目的

通过使用打印胶片与软拷贝显示,比较放射科医生对数字化乳腺钼靶图像解读的速度和准确性。

材料与方法

在接受数字化乳腺钼靶图像解读培训后,八位放射科医生解读了63例数字化乳腺钼靶图像,所有病例均有既往检查结果用于对比。所有病例的图像均由所有阅片者在软拷贝和打印胶片两种显示方式下进行解读,同一病例的两次解读间隔至少1个月。解读的病例包括6例经活检证实为癌症、20例经活检证实为良性病变、20例在6个月随访期内可能为良性的病例以及17例无明显异常的病例。计算软拷贝和打印胶片显示方式下的受试者操作特征曲线下面积(A(z))、敏感度和特异度。

结果

解读速度无显著差异,但软拷贝显示方式下的解读速度略快。A(z)、敏感度和特异度的差异均无统计学意义;打印胶片解读的A(z)和敏感度略好,软拷贝解读的特异度略好。

结论

软拷贝显示方式下的解读对于数字化乳腺钼靶检查可能有用,且不太可能显著改变准确性或速度。

相似文献

1
Interpretation of digital mammograms: comparison of speed and accuracy of soft-copy versus printed-film display.数字化乳腺X线摄影解读:软拷贝与胶片打印显示的速度及准确性比较
Radiology. 2002 May;223(2):483-8. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2232010704.
2
Breast lesion detection and classification: comparison of screen-film mammography and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading--observer performance study.乳腺病变的检测与分类:屏-片乳腺摄影与软读片全视野数字化乳腺摄影的比较——观察者性能研究
Radiology. 2005 Oct;237(1):37-44. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2371041605. Epub 2005 Aug 11.
3
Comparison of calcification specificity in digital mammography using soft-copy display versus screen-film mammography.使用软拷贝显示的数字乳腺摄影与屏-片乳腺摄影的钙化特异性比较。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006 Jul;187(1):47-50. doi: 10.2214/AJR.05.0187.
4
The effects of gray scale image processing on digital mammography interpretation performance.灰度图像处理对数字化乳腺摄影解读性能的影响。
Acad Radiol. 2005 May;12(5):585-95. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2005.01.017.
5
Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of breast masses using digitized images versus screen-film mammography.使用数字化图像与乳腺钼靶摄影对乳腺肿块诊断准确性的比较。
Acta Radiol. 2008 Jul;49(6):618-22. doi: 10.1080/02841850802014610.
6
Comparison of soft-copy and hard-copy reading for full-field digital mammography.全视野数字乳腺摄影软拷贝与硬拷贝阅读的比较。
Radiology. 2009 Apr;251(1):41-9. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2511071462.
7
Radiologists' preferences for digital mammographic display. The International Digital Mammography Development Group.放射科医生对数字化乳腺钼靶成像显示的偏好。国际数字化乳腺钼靶成像发展小组。
Radiology. 2000 Sep;216(3):820-30. doi: 10.1148/radiology.216.3.r00se48820.
8
Diagnostic accuracy of Fischer Senoscan Digital Mammography versus screen-film mammography in a diagnostic mammography population.在诊断性乳腺摄影人群中,菲舍尔乳腺数字扫描与屏-片乳腺摄影的诊断准确性比较
Acad Radiol. 2004 Aug;11(8):879-86. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2004.04.003.
9
[ROC analysis comparing screen film mammography and digital mammography].[比较屏-片乳腺摄影和数字乳腺摄影的ROC分析]
J Radiol. 2000 Feb;81(2):133-9.
10
Detection of breast cancer by soft-copy reading of digital mammograms: comparison between a routine image-processing parameter and high-contrast parameters.通过数字乳腺X线摄影软拷贝阅读检测乳腺癌:常规图像处理参数与高对比度参数的比较
Acta Radiol. 2010 Feb;51(1):15-20. doi: 10.3109/02841850903321625.

引用本文的文献

1
Noninferiority and Equivalence Evaluation of Clinical Performance among Computed Radiography, Film, and Digitized Film for Telemammography Services.计算机X线摄影、胶片及数字化胶片在远程乳腺摄影服务中临床性能的非劣效性和等效性评估
Int J Telemed Appl. 2016;2016:3642960. doi: 10.1155/2016/3642960. Epub 2016 Sep 29.
2
Evaluation of low-cost telemammography screening configurations: a comparison with film-screen readings in vulnerable areas.低成本远程乳腺钼靶筛查配置的评估:与弱势群体地区的胶片-屏幕阅读结果的比较
J Digit Imaging. 2014 Oct;27(5):679-86. doi: 10.1007/s10278-014-9695-y.
3
Mammographic system performance using an image reading qualification method.
Radiol Phys Technol. 2012 Jul;5(2):213-21. doi: 10.1007/s12194-012-0156-3. Epub 2012 May 1.
4
Effect of LCD monitor type and observer experience on diagnostic performance in soft-copy interpretations of the maxillary sinus on panoramic radiographs.液晶显示器类型和观察者经验对全景X线片上颌窦软读片诊断性能的影响。
Imaging Sci Dent. 2011 Mar;41(1):11-6. doi: 10.5624/isd.2011.41.1.11. Epub 2011 Mar 26.
5
Digital versus screen film mammography: a clinical comparison.数字乳腺摄影与屏-片乳腺摄影:临床比较
Biomed Imaging Interv J. 2008 Oct;4(4):e31. doi: 10.2349/biij.4.4.e31. Epub 2008 Oct 1.
6
The impact of digital mammography on screening a young cohort of women for breast cancer in an urban specialist breast unit.数字乳腺 X 线摄影对城市专科乳腺单位中年轻女性乳腺癌筛查的影响。
Eur Radiol. 2011 Apr;21(4):676-82. doi: 10.1007/s00330-010-1968-3. Epub 2010 Oct 1.
7
Detection of masses and calcifications by soft-copy reading: comparison of two postprocessing algorithms for full-field digital mammography.通过软拷贝阅读检测肿块和钙化:全视野数字乳腺摄影两种后处理算法的比较
Jpn J Radiol. 2009 May;27(4):168-75. doi: 10.1007/s11604-009-0315-6. Epub 2009 Jun 6.
8
Observer study for evaluating potential utility of a super-high-resolution LCD in the detection of clustered microcalcifications on digital mammograms.观察者研究评估超高清液晶显示器在数字乳腺钼靶片中检测簇状微钙化的潜在效用。
J Digit Imaging. 2010 Apr;23(2):161-9. doi: 10.1007/s10278-009-9192-x. Epub 2009 Mar 10.
9
Why does it take longer to read digital than film-screen screening mammograms? A partial explanation.为什么阅读数字比胶片筛查乳房 X 光片需要更长的时间?部分原因解释如下。
J Digit Imaging. 2010 Apr;23(2):170-80. doi: 10.1007/s10278-009-9177-9. Epub 2009 Feb 13.
10
Timed efficiency of interpretation of digital and film-screen screening mammograms.数字化乳腺钼靶和屏-片乳腺钼靶筛查的解读时间效率
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Jan;192(1):216-20. doi: 10.2214/AJR.07.3608.