• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Why does it take longer to read digital than film-screen screening mammograms? A partial explanation.为什么阅读数字比胶片筛查乳房 X 光片需要更长的时间?部分原因解释如下。
J Digit Imaging. 2010 Apr;23(2):170-80. doi: 10.1007/s10278-009-9177-9. Epub 2009 Feb 13.
2
Results of a survey on digital screening mammography: prevalence, efficiency, and use of ancillary diagnostic AIDS.数字化乳腺钼靶筛查调查结果:患病率、效率及辅助诊断辅助手段的使用情况
J Am Coll Radiol. 2008 Apr;5(4):585-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2007.10.019.
3
Timed efficiency of interpretation of digital and film-screen screening mammograms.数字化乳腺钼靶和屏-片乳腺钼靶筛查的解读时间效率
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Jan;192(1):216-20. doi: 10.2214/AJR.07.3608.
4
Effect of computer-aided detection on independent double reading of paired screen-film and full-field digital screening mammograms.计算机辅助检测对配对的屏-片乳腺钼靶和全视野数字化乳腺钼靶独立双人阅片的影响。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007 Feb;188(2):377-84. doi: 10.2214/AJR.05.2207.
5
Full-field digital mammographic interpretation with prior analog versus prior digitized analog mammography: time for interpretation.全数字化乳腺摄影与传统数字化乳腺摄影的对比:解读时间。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Jun;196(6):1436-8. doi: 10.2214/AJR.10.5430.
6
Does digital mammography in a decentralized breast cancer screening program lead to screening performance parameters comparable with film-screen mammography?在去中心化乳腺癌筛查项目中,数字乳腺 X 光摄影是否会导致与胶片乳腺 X 光摄影可比的筛查性能参数?
Eur Radiol. 2010 Oct;20(10):2307-14. doi: 10.1007/s00330-010-1807-6. Epub 2010 May 9.
7
Full-field digital versus screen-film mammography: comparative accuracy in concurrent screening cohorts.全视野数字化乳腺摄影与屏-片乳腺摄影:同期筛查队列中的比较准确性
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007 Oct;189(4):860-6. doi: 10.2214/AJR.07.2303.
8
[Comparing the visualization of microcalcifications with direct magnification in digital full-field mammography vs. film-screen mammography].[数字全场乳腺摄影与屏-片乳腺摄影中直接放大对微钙化可视化的比较]
Rofo. 2002 Mar;174(3):297-300. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-20603.
9
Does digital mammography increase detection of high-risk breast lesions presenting as calcifications?数字乳腺 X 线摄影是否会增加对表现为钙化的高危乳腺病变的检出率?
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013 Nov;201(5):1148-54. doi: 10.2214/AJR.12.10195.
10
Impact of prior mammograms on combined reading of digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis.既往乳腺钼靶检查对数字化乳腺钼靶摄影和数字化乳腺断层合成联合阅片的影响。
Acta Radiol. 2017 Feb;58(2):148-155. doi: 10.1177/0284185116647211. Epub 2016 Jul 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing health care use and cost consequences of a new screening modality: the case of digital mammography.评估新筛查方式对医疗保健利用和成本的影响:以数字乳腺 X 光摄影为例。
Med Care. 2012 Dec;50(12):1045-52. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318269e0d1.
2
Barriers and facilitators to adoption of soft copy interpretation from the user perspective: Lessons learned from filmless radiology for slideless pathology.从用户角度看采用软拷贝解读的障碍与促进因素:从无胶片放射学中汲取的经验教训以应用于无玻片病理学
J Pathol Inform. 2011 Jan 7;2:1. doi: 10.4103/2153-3539.74940.

本文引用的文献

1
Timed efficiency of interpretation of digital and film-screen screening mammograms.数字化乳腺钼靶和屏-片乳腺钼靶筛查的解读时间效率
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Jan;192(1):216-20. doi: 10.2214/AJR.07.3608.
2
Accuracy of soft-copy digital mammography versus that of screen-film mammography according to digital manufacturer: ACRIN DMIST retrospective multireader study.根据数字制造商比较软拷贝数字乳腺摄影与屏-片乳腺摄影的准确性:ACRIN DMIST回顾性多阅片者研究
Radiology. 2008 Apr;247(1):38-48. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2471070418.
3
Results of a survey on digital screening mammography: prevalence, efficiency, and use of ancillary diagnostic AIDS.数字化乳腺钼靶筛查调查结果:患病率、效率及辅助诊断辅助手段的使用情况
J Am Coll Radiol. 2008 Apr;5(4):585-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2007.10.019.
4
Diagnostic accuracy of digital versus film mammography: exploratory analysis of selected population subgroups in DMIST.数字乳腺摄影与胶片乳腺摄影的诊断准确性:DMIST中选定人群亚组的探索性分析。
Radiology. 2008 Feb;246(2):376-83. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2461070200.
5
Full-field digital versus screen-film mammography: comparative accuracy in concurrent screening cohorts.全视野数字化乳腺摄影与屏-片乳腺摄影:同期筛查队列中的比较准确性
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007 Oct;189(4):860-6. doi: 10.2214/AJR.07.2303.
6
Randomized trial of screen-film versus full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading in population-based screening program: follow-up and final results of Oslo II study.基于人群的筛查项目中,屏-片乳腺摄影与全视野数字化乳腺摄影软读片的随机试验:奥斯陆II研究的随访及最终结果
Radiology. 2007 Sep;244(3):708-17. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2443061478.
7
Digital and screen-film mammography: comparison of image acquisition and interpretation times.数字乳腺摄影与屏-片乳腺摄影:图像采集与判读时间的比较
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006 Jul;187(1):38-41. doi: 10.2214/AJR.05.1397.
8
Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening.数字化乳腺摄影与传统胶片乳腺摄影在乳腺癌筛查中的诊断性能
N Engl J Med. 2005 Oct 27;353(17):1773-83. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa052911. Epub 2005 Sep 16.
9
Diagnostic accuracy of Fischer Senoscan Digital Mammography versus screen-film mammography in a diagnostic mammography population.在诊断性乳腺摄影人群中,菲舍尔乳腺数字扫描与屏-片乳腺摄影的诊断准确性比较
Acad Radiol. 2004 Aug;11(8):879-86. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2004.04.003.
10
Screen-film mammography versus full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading: randomized trial in a population-based screening program--the Oslo II Study.屏-片乳腺摄影与软拷贝阅读的全视野数字化乳腺摄影对比:基于人群的筛查项目中的随机试验——奥斯陆II研究
Radiology. 2004 Jul;232(1):197-204. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2321031624. Epub 2004 May 20.

为什么阅读数字比胶片筛查乳房 X 光片需要更长的时间?部分原因解释如下。

Why does it take longer to read digital than film-screen screening mammograms? A partial explanation.

机构信息

Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Unit 1273, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX 77030-4009, USA.

出版信息

J Digit Imaging. 2010 Apr;23(2):170-80. doi: 10.1007/s10278-009-9177-9. Epub 2009 Feb 13.

DOI:10.1007/s10278-009-9177-9
PMID:19214635
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3043768/
Abstract

Digital screening mammograms (DM) take longer to interpret than film-screen screening mammograms (FSM). We evaluated what part of the process takes long in our reading environment. We selected cases from those for which timed readings had been performed as part of a previous study. Readers were timed as they performed various computer manipulations on groups of DM cases and as they moved the alternator and adjusted lighting and manual shutters for FSM cases. Subtracting manipulation time from the original interpretation times yielded estimated times to reach a decision. Manipulation times for DM ranged from a low of 11 s when four-view DM were simply opened and closed in a 4-on-1 hanging protocol before moving on to the next study to 113.8 s when each view of six-view DM were brought up 1-on-1, enlarged to 100% resolution, and panned through. Manipulation times for groups of FSM ranged from 8.3 to 12.1 s. Estimated decision-making times for DM ranged from 128.0 to 202.2 s, while estimated decision-making time for FSM ranged from 60.9 to 146.3 s. Computer manipulation time partially explains the discrepancy in interaction times between DM and FSM. Radiologists also appear to spend more time looking at DM than at FSM before making a decision.

摘要

数字筛查乳房 X 光摄影(DM)的解释时间长于胶片筛查乳房 X 光摄影(FSM)。我们评估了在我们的阅读环境中哪个过程需要很长时间。我们从之前一项研究中进行定时阅读的病例中选择了病例。当读者对 DM 病例组进行各种计算机操作,以及为 FSM 病例移动旋转器、调整灯光和手动快门时,他们会被计时。从原始解释时间中减去操作时间,得出到达决策的估计时间。DM 的操作时间从低至 11 秒,当四视图 DM 按照 4 对 1 悬挂协议简单打开和关闭,然后继续下一个研究时,到六视图 DM 的每个视图单独打开、放大到 100%分辨率并平移时的 113.8 秒不等。FSM 组的操作时间范围为 8.3 到 12.1 秒。DM 的估计决策时间范围从 128.0 到 202.2 秒,而 FSM 的估计决策时间范围从 60.9 到 146.3 秒。计算机操作时间部分解释了 DM 和 FSM 之间交互时间差异的原因。放射科医生在做出决策之前似乎也花更多的时间查看 DM 而不是 FSM。