• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

空中交通管制员在未来空中交通管理中的作用:主动控制与被动监测的实证研究。

The role of the air traffic controller in future air traffic management: an empirical study of active control versus passive monitoring.

作者信息

Metzger U, Parasuraman R

机构信息

Fairchild Dornier GmbH, Wessling, Germany.

出版信息

Hum Factors. 2001 Winter;43(4):519-28. doi: 10.1518/001872001775870421.

DOI:10.1518/001872001775870421
PMID:12002002
Abstract

Proposals for air traffic management such as Free Flight call for a transfer of responsibility for separation between aircraft from air traffic controllers (ATCos) to pilots. Under many proposals, the role of the ATCo will change from one of active control to passive monitoring. The present study directly compared these types of control with respect to ATCo mental workload, conflict detection, and memory. Eighteen ATCos participated in an air traffic control simulation of Free Flight procedures under moderate and high traffic load. Dependent variables included accuracy and timeliness in detecting potential conflicts, accepting and handing off aircraft, mental workload (as assessed by a secondary task, heart rate variability, and subjective ratings), and memory for aircraft location. High traffic density and passive control both degraded conflict detection performance. Actual or potential applications of this research include the recommendation that designs for future air traffic management keep authority for separation of aircraft with the controller.

摘要

诸如“自由飞行”之类的空中交通管理提案要求将飞机之间间隔距离的责任从空中交通管制员(ATCos)转移到飞行员身上。在许多提案中,空中交通管制员的角色将从主动控制转变为被动监测。本研究就空中交通管制员的心理工作量、冲突检测和记忆方面,对这些控制类型进行了直接比较。18名空中交通管制员参与了在中等和高交通负荷下的“自由飞行”程序的空中交通管制模拟。因变量包括检测潜在冲突、接收和移交飞机的准确性和及时性、心理工作量(通过一项次要任务、心率变异性和主观评分进行评估)以及对飞机位置的记忆。高交通密度和被动控制都会降低冲突检测性能。这项研究的实际或潜在应用包括建议未来空中交通管理的设计应将飞机间隔距离的控制权保留给管制员。

相似文献

1
The role of the air traffic controller in future air traffic management: an empirical study of active control versus passive monitoring.空中交通管制员在未来空中交通管理中的作用:主动控制与被动监测的实证研究。
Hum Factors. 2001 Winter;43(4):519-28. doi: 10.1518/001872001775870421.
2
Changing the role of the air traffic controller: how will free flight affect memory for spatial events?改变空中交通管制员的角色:自由飞行将如何影响对空间事件的记忆?
Appl Ergon. 2007 Jul;38(4):457-63. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2007.01.007. Epub 2007 Apr 23.
3
Automation in future air traffic management: effects of decision aid reliability on controller performance and mental workload.未来空中交通管理中的自动化:决策辅助可靠性对管制员绩效和心理负荷的影响。
Hum Factors. 2005 Spring;47(1):35-49. doi: 10.1518/0018720053653802.
4
A passive brain-computer interface application for the mental workload assessment on professional air traffic controllers during realistic air traffic control tasks.一种用于在实际空中交通管制任务期间对专业空中交通管制员进行心理负荷评估的被动式脑机接口应用程序。
Prog Brain Res. 2016;228:295-328. doi: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2016.04.021. Epub 2016 Jun 3.
5
Predicting Air Traffic Controller Workload: Trajectory Uncertainty as the Moderator of the Indirect Effect of Traffic Density on Controller Workload Through Traffic Conflict.预测空中交通管制员的工作量:轨迹不确定性作为交通密度通过交通冲突对管制员工作量产生间接影响的调节因素。
Hum Factors. 2016 Jun;58(4):560-73. doi: 10.1177/0018720816639418. Epub 2016 Apr 13.
6
Mental workload in air traffic control: an index constructed from field tests.空中交通管制中的心理负荷:一项基于实地测试构建的指标。
Aviat Space Environ Med. 2004 Apr;75(4):333-41.
7
An analysis of relational complexity in an air traffic control conflict detection task.空中交通管制冲突检测任务中的关系复杂性分析。
Ergonomics. 2006 Nov 15;49(14):1508-26. doi: 10.1080/00140130600779744.
8
The Difficulty to Break a Relational Complexity Network Can Predict Air Traffic Controllers' Mental Workload and Performance in Conflict Resolution.打破关系复杂性网络的难度可以预测空中交通管制员在解决冲突时的心理工作量和绩效。
Hum Factors. 2021 Mar;63(2):240-253. doi: 10.1177/0018720819880646. Epub 2019 Oct 16.
9
Helicopter pilots' views of air traffic controller responsibilities: a mismatch.直升机飞行员对空中交通管制员职责的看法:不匹配。
Ergonomics. 2019 Feb;62(2):268-276. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2018.1440635. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
10
The impact of alerting designs on air traffic controller's eye movement patterns and situation awareness.告警设计对空中交通管制员眼动模式和态势感知的影响。
Ergonomics. 2019 Feb;62(2):305-318. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2018.1493151. Epub 2018 Sep 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Associating Vehicles Automation With Drivers Functional State Assessment Systems: A Challenge for Road Safety in the Future.将车辆自动化与驾驶员功能状态评估系统相结合:未来道路安全面临的一项挑战。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2019 Apr 24;13:131. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00131. eCollection 2019.
2
Out of the Loop, in Your Bubble: Mind Wandering Is Independent From Automation Reliability, but Influences Task Engagement.置身事外,沉浸自我:思绪游走独立于自动化可靠性,但会影响任务投入度。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2018 Sep 20;12:383. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00383. eCollection 2018.
3
Autopilot, Mind Wandering, and the Out of the Loop Performance Problem.
自动驾驶、思绪漫游与脱离循环性能问题。
Front Neurosci. 2017 Oct 5;11:541. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2017.00541. eCollection 2017.
4
Characterization of Visual Scanning Patterns in Air Traffic Control.空中交通管制中视觉扫描模式的特征描述。
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2016;2016:8343842. doi: 10.1155/2016/8343842. Epub 2016 Apr 7.