Schimpf Paul H, Ramon Ceon, Haueisen Jens
School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Washington State University, Spokane 99202 USA.
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2002 May;49(5):409-18. doi: 10.1109/10.995679.
The current dipole is a widely used source model in forward and inverse electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography applications. Analytic solutions to the governing field equations have been developed for several approximations of the human head using ideal dipoles as the source model. Numeric approaches such as the finite-element and finite-difference methods have become popular because they allow the use of anatomically realistic head models and the increased computational power that they require has become readily available. Although numeric methods can represent more realistic domains, the sources in such models are an approximation of the ideal dipole. In this paper, we examine several methods for representing dipole sources in finite-element models and compare the resulting surface potentials and external magnetic field with those obtained from analytic solutions using ideal dipoles.
电流偶极子是在正、逆脑电图和脑磁图应用中广泛使用的源模型。对于使用理想偶极子作为源模型的几种人体头部近似情况,已经开发出了控制场方程的解析解。诸如有限元法和有限差分法等数值方法已经变得很流行,因为它们允许使用符合解剖学实际的头部模型,而且它们所需的增加的计算能力也已很容易获得。尽管数值方法可以表示更实际的区域,但此类模型中的源是理想偶极子的一种近似。在本文中,我们研究了在有限元模型中表示偶极子源的几种方法,并将由此产生的表面电位和外部磁场与使用理想偶极子从解析解中获得的结果进行比较。