• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肘关节伸展能否用作具有临床意义损伤的一项检测?

Can elbow extension be used as a test of clinically significant injury?

作者信息

Docherty Martin A, Schwab Robert A, Ma O John

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, Truman Medical Center, 64108, USA.

出版信息

South Med J. 2002 May;95(5):539-41.

PMID:12005013
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to evaluate whether a simple test of full elbow extension was a reliable indicator of bone/joint injury at the elbow joint.

METHODS

In this prospective study, patients with acute elbow injuries were asked to fully extend the injured elbow. Radiologists blinded to the results of the extension test interpreted the radiographs.

RESULTS

Of 114 patients with acute elbow injury entered into the study, 110 underwent adiographic evaluation. Inability to extend the elbow was found in 37 of 38 patients with bone injury. Only 1 of 54 patients who were able to fully extend the elbow was found to have bone/joint injury. The sensitivity and specificity of the elbow-extension test for identification of bone/joint injury was 97% and 69%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The elbow-extension test can be used as a sensitive clinical screening test for patients with acute elbow injuries.

摘要

背景

本研究的目的是评估简单的肘关节完全伸展测试是否是肘关节骨/关节损伤的可靠指标。

方法

在这项前瞻性研究中,要求急性肘关节损伤患者将受伤的肘关节完全伸展。对伸展测试结果不知情的放射科医生解读X光片。

结果

纳入本研究的114例急性肘关节损伤患者中,110例接受了放射学评估。38例骨损伤患者中有37例无法伸展肘关节。在54例能够完全伸展肘关节的患者中,仅1例被发现有骨/关节损伤。肘关节伸展测试用于识别骨/关节损伤的敏感性和特异性分别为97%和69%。

结论

肘关节伸展测试可作为急性肘关节损伤患者的敏感临床筛查测试。

相似文献

1
Can elbow extension be used as a test of clinically significant injury?肘关节伸展能否用作具有临床意义损伤的一项检测?
South Med J. 2002 May;95(5):539-41.
2
Can elbow-extension test be used as an alternative to radiographs in primary care?在初级医疗保健中,伸肘试验能否替代X光片?
Eur J Gen Pract. 2007;13(4):221-4. doi: 10.1080/13814780701814820.
3
Extension test and ossal point tenderness cannot accurately exclude significant injury in acute elbow trauma.伸展试验和骨点压痛不能准确排除急性肘部创伤中的严重损伤。
Ann Emerg Med. 2014 Jul;64(1):74-8. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2014.01.022. Epub 2014 Feb 13.
4
Elbow extension test to rule out elbow fracture: multicentre, prospective validation and observational study of diagnostic accuracy in adults and children.用于排除肘部骨折的伸肘试验:多中心、前瞻性验证及成人和儿童诊断准确性的观察性研究
BMJ. 2008 Dec 9;337:a2428. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a2428.
5
Inability to fully extend the injured elbow: an indicator of significant injury.受伤肘部无法完全伸直:严重损伤的一个指标。
Arch Emerg Med. 1991 Dec;8(4):253-6. doi: 10.1136/emj.8.4.253.
6
Performance of the 4-way range of motion test for radiographic injuries after blunt elbow trauma.钝性肘部创伤后影像学损伤的四向活动度测试表现
Am J Emerg Med. 2016 Feb;34(2):235-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2015.10.031. Epub 2015 Oct 24.
7
The elbow extension test remains a useful adjunct to clinical judgment in elbow trauma.在肘部创伤中,伸肘试验仍是临床判断的一项有用辅助手段。
Ann Emerg Med. 2015 Feb;65(2):233. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2014.10.003.
8
Deriving the East Riding Elbow Rule (ER2): a maximally sensitive decision tool for elbow injury.推导东赖丁肘法则(ER2):一种针对肘部损伤的最敏感决策工具。
Emerg Med J. 2014 May;31(5):380-3. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2012-202169. Epub 2013 Feb 8.
9
Point tenderness at 1 of 5 locations and limited elbow extension identify significant injury in children with acute elbow trauma: a study of diagnostic accuracy.5个部位中1个部位的压痛及肘关节伸展受限可确定急性肘部创伤儿童的严重损伤:诊断准确性研究
Am J Emerg Med. 2015 Feb;33(2):229-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2014.11.028. Epub 2014 Nov 29.
10
[Hinged external fixation in orthopaedic and trauma surgery of the elbow].[铰链式外固定在肘部骨科与创伤外科手术中的应用]
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2013;80(6):391-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Diagnostic accuracy of clinical tests to rule out elbow fracture: a systematic review.排除肘部骨折的临床检查诊断准确性:一项系统评价
Clin Shoulder Elb. 2023 Jun;26(2):182-190. doi: 10.5397/cise.2022.00948. Epub 2022 Aug 16.
2
Normative values and affecting factors for the elbow range of motion.肘关节活动范围的正常值及影响因素。
Shoulder Elbow. 2019 Jun;11(3):215-224. doi: 10.1177/1758573217728711. Epub 2017 Sep 11.
3
The reliability and validity of goniometric elbow measurements in adults: A systematic review of the literature.
成人肘关节测角法测量的可靠性和有效性:文献系统评价
Shoulder Elbow. 2018 Oct;10(4):274-284. doi: 10.1177/1758573218774326. Epub 2018 Jun 3.
4
Sideline coverage: when to get radiographs? A review of clinical decision tools.旁线报道:何时需要拍摄 X 光片?临床决策工具的回顾。
Sports Health. 2014 May;6(3):274-8. doi: 10.1177/1941738114529701.
5
Validity of goniometric elbow measurements: comparative study with a radiographic method.关节角度测量的有效性:与放射照相法的比较研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Nov;469(11):3134-40. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-1986-8. Epub 2011 Jul 21.
6
Elbow extension test to rule out elbow fracture: multicentre, prospective validation and observational study of diagnostic accuracy in adults and children.用于排除肘部骨折的伸肘试验:多中心、前瞻性验证及成人和儿童诊断准确性的观察性研究
BMJ. 2008 Dec 9;337:a2428. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a2428.
7
Can a normal range of elbow movement predict a normal elbow x ray?肘关节活动范围正常能否预测肘关节X线检查结果正常?
Emerg Med J. 2007 Feb;24(2):86-8. doi: 10.1136/emj.2006.039792.